Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gary Brandt Bucher II

dblp:286/4454 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-5083-3311ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › type systems
dynamic typing
0.912025
Dynamic Region Ownership for Concurrency Safety · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Programming languages and type systems › type systems
ownership types
0.912025
Dynamic Region Ownership for Concurrency Safety · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

region discipline · 0.9ownership model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Dynamic Region Ownership for Concurrency Safety
abstract
The ways in which the components of a program interact with each other in a concurrent setting can be considerably more complex than in a sequential setting. The core problem is unrestricted shared mutable state. An alternative to unrestricted shared mutable state is to restrict the sharing using Ownership. Ownership can turn what would have been a race into a deterministic failure that can be explained to the programmer. However, Ownership has predominantly taken place in statically typed languages. In this paper, we explore retrofitting an existing dynamically typed programming language with an ownership model based on regions. Our core aim is to provide safe concurrency, that is, the ownership model should provide deterministic dynamic failures of ownership that can be explained to the programmer. We present a dynamic model of ownership that provides ownership of groups objects called regions. We provide dynamic enforcement of our region discipline, which we have implemented in a simple interpreter that provides a Pythonlike syntax and semantics, and report on our first steps into integrating it into an existing language, Python.
Fridtjof Peer Stoldt, Gary Brandt Bucher II, Sylvan Clebsch, Matthew Johnson 0003, Matthew J. Parkinson, Guido van Rossum, Eric Snow, Tobias Wrigstad
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.2
2020 Dynamic pattern matching with Python
abstract
Pattern matching allows programs both to extract specific information from complex data types, as well as to branch on the structure of data and thus apply specialized actions to different forms of data. Originally designed for strongly typed functional languages with algebraic data types, pattern matching has since been adapted for object-oriented and even dynamic languages. This paper discusses how pattern matching can be included in the dynamically typed language Python in line with existing features that support extracting values from sequential data structures.
Tobias Kohn, Guido van Rossum, Gary Brandt Bucher II, Talin, Ivan Levkivskyi
DLS3