Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sy-Tuyen Ho
dblp:287/7389
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Efficient and distributed learning · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack
model inversion attack |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | On the Vulnerability of Skip Connections to Model Inversion Attacks · ECCV (81) 2024 Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help? · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help? · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights · NeurIPS 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack › model inversion attack
model inversion defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help? · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and Insights · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.5model inversion attacks · 1.5fisher information · 1.5training-free proxy · 0.8neural architecture search · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Model Inversion Robustness: Can Transfer Learning Help?abstractModel Inversion (MI) attacks aim to reconstruct private training data by abusing access to machine learning models. Contemporary MI attacks have achieved impressive attack performance, posing serious threats to privacy. Meanwhile, all existing MI defense methods rely on regularization that is in direct conflict with the training objective, resulting in noticeable degradation in model utility. In this work, we take a different perspective, and propose a novel and simple Transfer Learning-based Defense against Model Inversion (TL-DMI) to render MI-robust models. Particularly, by leveraging TL, we limit the number of layers encoding sensitive information from private training dataset, thereby degrading the performance of MI attack. We conduct an analysis using Fisher Information to justify our method. Our defense is remarkably simple to implement. Without bells and whistles, we show in extensive experiments that TL-DMI achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) MI robustness. Our code, pre-trained models, demo and inverted data are available at: https://hosytuyen.github.io/projectsITL-DMI Sy-Tuyen Ho, Koh Jun Hao, Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran, Ngoc-Bao Nguyen, Ngai-Man Cheung |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | On the Vulnerability of Skip Connections to Model Inversion Attacks
Koh Jun Hao, Sy-Tuyen Ho, Ngoc-Bao Nguyen, Ngai-Man Cheung |
ECCV (81) | 2 |
| 2024 | Vision Transformer Neural Architecture Search for Out-of-Distribution Generalization: Benchmark and InsightsabstractWhile Vision Transformer (ViT) have achieved success across various machine learning tasks, deploying them in real-world scenarios faces a critical challenge: generalizing under Out-of-Distribution (OoD) shifts. A crucial research gap remains in understanding how to design ViT architectures – both manually and automatically – to excel in OoD generalization. **To address this gap,** we introduce OoD-ViT-NAS, the first systematic benchmark for ViT Neural Architecture Search (NAS) focused on OoD generalization. This comprehensive benchmark includes 3,000 ViT architectures of varying model computational budgets evaluated on common large-scale OoD datasets. With this comprehensive benchmark at hand, we analyze the factors that contribute to the OoD generalization of ViT architecture. Our analysis uncovers several key insights. Firstly, we show that ViT architecture designs have a considerable impact on OoD generalization. Secondly, we observe that In-Distribution (ID) accuracy might not be a very good indicator of OoD accuracy. This underscores the risk that ViT architectures optimized for ID accuracy might not perform well under OoD shifts. Thirdly, we conduct the first study to explore NAS for ViT’s OoD robustness. Specifically, we study 9 Training-free NAS for their OoD generalization performance on our benchmark. We observe that existing Training-free NAS are largely ineffective in predicting OoD accuracy despite their effectiveness at predicting ID accuracy. Moreover, simple proxies like #Param or #Flop surprisingly outperform more complex Training-free NAS in predicting ViTs OoD accuracy. Finally, we study how ViT architectural attributes impact OoD generalization. We discover that increasing embedding dimensions of a ViT architecture generally can improve the OoD generalization. We show that ViT architectures in our benchmark exhibit a wide range of OoD accuracy, with up to 11.85% for some OoD shift, prompting the importance to study ViT architecture design for OoD. We firmly believe that our OoD-ViT-NAS benchmark and our analysis can catalyze and streamline important research on understanding how ViT architecture designs influence OoD generalization. **Our OoD-NAS-ViT benchmark and code are available at [https://hosytuyen.github.io/projects/OoD-ViT-NAS](https://hosytuyen.github.io/projects/OoD-ViT-NAS)** Sy-Tuyen Ho, Tuan Van Vo, Somayeh Ebrahimkhani, Ngai-Man Cheung |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Abstraction-perception preserving cartoon face synthesis
Sy-Tuyen Ho, Manh-Khanh Ngo Huu, Thanh-Danh Nguyen, Nguyen Phan, Vinh-Tiep Nguyen, Thanh Duc Ngo, Duy-Dinh Le, Tam V. Nguyen 0002 |
Multim. Tools Appl. | 1 |