Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Smrithi Thudi

dblp:288/8121 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8684-8189ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 67% Health and well-being technologies · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction
0.712023
Power-Based Velocity-Domain Variable Structure Passivity Signature Control for Physical Human-(Tele)Robot Interaction · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.712023
Power-Based Velocity-Domain Variable Structure Passivity Signature Control for Physical Human-(Tele)Robot Interaction · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
telerehabilitation
0.712023
Power-Based Velocity-Domain Variable Structure Passivity Signature Control for Physical Human-(Tele)Robot Interaction · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
teleoperation
0.512021
Time-Domain Passivity-based Controller with an Optimal Two-channel Lawrence Telerobotic Architecture* · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › passivity-based control
time-domain passivity control
0.512021
Time-Domain Passivity-based Controller with an Optimal Two-channel Lawrence Telerobotic Architecture* · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variable structure control · 0.7passivity-based control · 0.7nonlinear control · 0.7two-port passivity · 0.5multi-objective optimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Power-Based Velocity-Domain Variable Structure Passivity Signature Control for Physical Human-(Tele)Robot Interaction
abstract
The excess of passivity (EoP) of the human biomechanics plays an imperative role in absorbing the interaction energy during physical human–(tele)robot interaction and can be exploited by controllers used for stabilization of human-centered (tele)robotic systems. However, the first generation of nonlinear EoP-based stabilizers loaded the force reflection channel resulting in degradation of the force profile. This will challenge applications that are heavily dependent on the quality of force reflection, such as telerobotic rehabilitation. This article explores the possibility of developing a nonlinear stabilizer that modifies the reflected velocity to the follower-side operator based on the corresponding EoP map. As an applied benefit in the context of telerehabilitation, the proposed stabilizer does not require information about the EoP of all patients; instead, it would require that for the individual therapist who works with the group of patients. The article provides the mathematical derivation and stability proof of the nonlinear design of the stabilizer named “power-based velocity-domain variable structure passivity signature control (PV-VSPSC).” The proposed nonlinear stabilizer is evaluated through systematic experiments and systematic grid simulation studies in this paper.
Peter Paik, Smrithi Thudi, Seyed Farokh Atashzar
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2021 Time-Domain Passivity-based Controller with an Optimal Two-channel Lawrence Telerobotic Architecture*
abstract
The time-domain passivity approach has been proposed in the literature in a variety of formats to guarantee the stability of teleoperation leader-follower systems. The conventional use of the proposed technique utilizes the control effort at the follower side as the force feedback to be sent back to the user at the leader’s side. However, this has resulted in transparency problems, especially when the follower dynamics are not negligible. On the other hand, four-channel and three-channel Lawrence architectures have been investigated widely in the literature to maximize the transparency of the system when, in most advanced cases, stability is guaranteed using wave-variables. However, wave-variables are historically known for their transparency deterioration problems. In this paper, we propose a two-layer approach taking advantage of the fusion of (a) a more optimal derivation of Lawrence telerobotic architecture (utilizing only two channels), and (b) a two-port time-domain passivity stabilizer while comparing the performance with a one-port passivity stabilizer. The two-channel derivation of the Lawrence architecture allows for implementing a two-port time domain passivity approach, which is investigated in this paper. The performance of this is compared systematically through a multi-objective approach by analyzing dissipated energy besides force and velocity errors for a wide range of time delays and frequencies of excitation. The paper gives a comprehensive view of the efficacy of two-port versus one-port time-domain passivity control when combined with the two-channel derivation of Lawrence architecture.
Navid Feizi, Smrithi Thudi, Rajnikant V. Patel, Seyed Farokh Atashzar
ICRA2