Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chuancheng Lv
dblp:289/1635
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 52% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Efficient and distributed learning · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
long-context alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GATEAU: Selecting Influential Samples for Long Context Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process
hawkes process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Temporal Cross-Effects in Knowledge Tracing · WSDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Temporal Cross-Effects in Knowledge Tracing · WSDM 2021 |
Computing education › student modeling
knowledge tracing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Temporal Cross-Effects in Knowledge Tracing · WSDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GATEAU: Selecting Influential Samples for Long Context Alignment · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
temporal modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Temporal Cross-Effects in Knowledge Tracing · WSDM 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual excitation · 1.0kernel function · 1.0submodular optimization · 0.9influence functions · 0.9multiple-choice question answering · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GATEAU: Selecting Influential Samples for Long Context AlignmentabstractShuzheng Si, Haozhe Zhao, Gang Chen, Yunshui Li, Kangyang Luo, Chuancheng Lv, Kaikai An, Fanchao Qi, Baobao Chang, Maosong Sun. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025. Shuzheng Si, Haozhe Zhao, Gang Chen 0039, Yunshui Li, Kangyang Luo, Chuancheng Lv, Kaikai An, Fanchao Qi, Baobao Chang, Maosong Sun 0001 |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2023 | C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation ModelsabstractNew NLP benchmarks are urgently needed to align with the rapid development of large language models (LLMs). We present C-Eval, the first comprehensive Chinese evaluation suite designed to assess advanced knowledge and reasoning abilities of foundation models in a Chinese context. C-Eval comprises multiple-choice questions across four difficulty levels: middle school, high school, college, and professional. The questions span 52 diverse disciplines, ranging from humanities to science and engineering. C-Eval is accompanied by C-Eval Hard, a subset of very challenging subjects in C-Eval that requires advanced reasoning abilities to solve. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the most advanced LLMs on C-Eval, including both English- and Chinese-oriented models. Results indicate that only GPT-4 could achieve an average accuracy of over 60%, suggesting that there is still significant room for improvement for current LLMs. We anticipate C-Eval will help analyze important strengths and shortcomings of foundation models, and foster their development and growth for Chinese users. Yuzhen Huang 0002, Yuzhuo Bai, Junlei Zhang, Jinghan Zhang 0006, Tangjun Su, Junteng Liu, Chuancheng Lv, Jiayi Lei, Maosong Sun 0001, Junxian He |
NeurIPS | 8 |
| 2021 | Temporal Cross-Effects in Knowledge TracingabstractKnowledge tracing (KT) aims to model students' knowledge level based on their historical performance, which plays an important role in computer-assisted education and adaptive learning. Recent studies try to take temporal effects of past interactions into consideration, such as the forgetting behavior. However, existing work mainly relies on time-related features or a global decay function to model the time-sensitive effects. Fine-grained temporal dynamics of different cross-skill impacts have not been well studied (named as temporal cross-effects). For example, cross-effects on some difficult skills may drop quickly, and the effects caused by distinct previous interactions may also have different temporal evolutions, which cannot be captured in a global way. In this work, we investigate fine-grained temporal cross-effects between different skills in KT. We first validate the existence of temporal cross-effects in real-world datasets through empirical studies. Then, a novel model, HawkesKT, is proposed to explicitly model the temporal cross-effects inspired by the point process, where each previous interaction will have different time-sensitive impacts on the mastery of the target skill. HawkesKT adopts two components to model temporal cross-effects: 1) mutual excitation represents the degree of cross-effects and 2) kernel function controls the adaptive temporal evolution. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to introduce Hawkes process to model temporal cross-effects in KT. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets show that HawkesKT is superior to state-of-the-art KT methods. Remarkably, our method also exhibits excellent interpretability and shows significant advantages in training efficiency, which makes it more applicable in real-world large-scale educational settings. Chenyang Wang 0003, Weizhi Ma, Min Zhang 0006, Chuancheng Lv, Fengyuan Wan, Huijie Lin, Taoran Tang, Yiqun Liu 0001, Shaoping Ma |
WSDM | 4 |