Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wai-Seng Ng

dblp:289/1795 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding › image quality assessment › image aesthetics assessment
computational aesthetics
0.112009
An esthetics rule-based ranking system for amateur photos · SIGGRAPH ASIA Sketches 2009
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
photo quality assessment
0.112009
An esthetics rule-based ranking system for amateur photos · SIGGRAPH ASIA Sketches 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human visual perception · 0.1aesthetic rules · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 An esthetics rule-based ranking system for amateur photos
abstract
With the current widespread use of digital cameras, the process of selecting and maintaining personal photos is becoming an onerous task. To our knowledge, there has been little research on photo evaluation based on computational esthetics. Photographers around the world have established some general rules for taking good photos. Building upon artistic theories and human visual perception is difficult since the results tend to be subjective. Although automatically ranking award-wining professional photos may not be a sensible pursuit, such an approach may be reasonable for photos taken by amateurs. In the next section, we introduce rules for such a system.
Che-Hua Yeh, Wai-Seng Ng, Brian A. Barsky, Ouhyoung Ming
SIGGRAPH ASIA Sketches2