Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philipp Bomatter

dblp:289/5510 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Segmentation and scene understanding · 17% Deep learning architectures and training · 5%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.422025
Is Limited Participant Diversity Impeding EEG-based Machine Learning? · NeurIPS 2025
When Pigs Fly: Contextual Reasoning in Synthetic and Natural Scenes · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.912025
Is Limited Participant Diversity Impeding EEG-based Machine Learning? · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › context modeling
scene context reasoning
0.512021
When Pigs Fly: Contextual Reasoning in Synthetic and Natural Scenes · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
0.112021
When Pigs Fly: Contextual Reasoning in Synthetic and Natural Scenes · ICCV 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 1.7empirical study · 1.7data augmentation · 1.7psychophysics · 0.5multi-head attention · 0.53d simulation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Is Limited Participant Diversity Impeding EEG-based Machine Learning?
abstract
The application of machine learning (ML) to electroencephalography (EEG) has great potential to advance both neuroscientific research and clinical applications. However, the generalisability and robustness of EEG-based ML models often hinge on the amount and diversity of training data. It is common practice to split EEG recordings into small segments, thereby increasing the number of samples substantially compared to the number of individual recordings or participants. We conceptualise this as a multi-level data generation process and investigate the scaling behaviour of model performance with respect to the overall sample size and the participant diversity through large-scale empirical studies. We then use the same framework to investigate the effectiveness of different ML strategies designed to address limited data problems: data augmentations and self-supervised learning. Our findings show that model performance scaling can be severely constrained by participant distribution shifts and provide actionable guidance for data collection and ML research. The code for our experiments is publicly available online.
Philipp Bomatter, Henry Gouk
NeurIPS1
2021 When Pigs Fly: Contextual Reasoning in Synthetic and Natural Scenes
abstract
Context is of fundamental importance to both human and machine vision; e.g., an object in the air is more likely to be an airplane than a pig. The rich notion of context incorporates several aspects including physics rules, statistical co-occurrences, and relative object sizes, among others. While previous work has focused on crowd-sourced out-of-context photographs from the web to study scene context, controlling the nature and extent of contextual violations has been a daunting task. Here we introduce a diverse, synthetic Out-of-Context Dataset (OCD) with fine-grained control over scene context. By leveraging a 3D simulation engine, we systematically control the gravity, object co-occurrences and relative sizes across 36 object categories in a virtual household environment. We conducted a series of experiments to gain insights into the impact of contextual cues on both human and machine vision using OCD. We conducted psychophysics experiments to establish a human benchmark for out-of-context recognition, and then compared it with state-of-the-art computer vision models to quantify the gap between the two. We propose a context-aware recognition transformer model, fusing object and contextual information via multi-head attention. Our model captures useful information for contextual reasoning, enabling human-level performance and better robustness in out-of-context conditions compared to baseline models across OCD and other out-of-context datasets. All source code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/kreimanlab/WhenPigsFlyContext
Philipp Bomatter, Mengmi Zhang, Dimitar Karev, Spandan Madan, Claire Tseng, Gabriel Kreiman
ICCV1