Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick M. Zurek

dblp:29/11362 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
0009-0000-6087-3055ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Audio and music processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
microphone array processing
0.021997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. II. A two-microphone adaptive system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output .I. Fixed-processing systems · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997
Audio and music processing
speech enhancement
0.021997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. II. A two-microphone adaptive system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output .I. Fixed-processing systems · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
hearing aids
0.011995
Reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1995
Audio and music processing
sound source localization
0.011997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output .I. Fixed-processing systems · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997
Audio and music processing
spatial audio
0.011997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output .I. Fixed-processing systems · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997
Accessibility and assistive technology › deaf and hard of hearing technology
hearing aids
0.011997
Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. II. A two-microphone adaptive system · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

frequency-domain splitting · 0.0adaptive filtering · 0.0fixed beamforming · 0.0binaural cue preservation · 0.0adaptive notch filter · 0.0adaptive feedback cancellation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output .I. Fixed-processing systems
abstract
This work is aimed at developing a design for the use of a microphone array with binaural hearing aids. The goal of such a hearing aid is to provide both the spatial-filtering benefits of the array and the natural benefits to sound localization and speech intelligibility that accrue from binaural listening. The present study examines two types of designs for fixed-processing systems: one in which independent arrays provide outputs to the two ears, and another in which the binaural outputs are derived from a single array. For the latter, various methods are used to merge array processing with binaural listening. In one approach, filters are designed to satisfy a frequency-dependent trade between directionality and binaural cue fidelity. In another, the microphone signals are filtered into low- and high-frequency components with the lowpass signals providing binaural cues and the highpass signal being the single output of the array processor. Acoustic and behavioral measurements were made in an anechoic chamber and in a moderately reverberant room to evaluate example systems. Theoretical performance was calculated for model arrays mounted on an idealized spherical head. Results show that both single- and dual-array systems provided target-intelligibility enhancements (2-4 dB improvements in speech reception threshold) relative to binaural cardioid microphones. In addition, the binaural-output systems provided cues that assist in sound localization, with resulting performance depending directly upon the cue fidelity. Finally, the sphere-based calculations accurately reflected the major features of the actual head-mounted array results, both in terms of directional sensitivity and output binaural cues.
Joseph G. Desloge, William M. Rabinowitz, Patrick M. Zurek
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
1997 Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. II. A two-microphone adaptive system
abstract
For pt.I see ibid., vol.5, no.6, p.529-42, 1997. This work is aimed at developing a design for the use of a microphone array with binaural hearing aids. The goal of such a hearing aid is to provide both the spatial-filtering benefits of the array and the natural benefits to sound localization ability and speech intelligibility that result from binaural listening. The present study examines a design in which two ear-level omnidirectional microphones constitute the array. The merging of array processing with binaural listening is accomplished by dividing the frequency spectrum, devoting the lowpass part to binaural processing and the highpass part to adaptive array processing. Acoustic and behavioral measurements were made in an anechoic chamber and in a moderately reverberant room to assess the trade-off between sound localization and speech reception as the cutoff frequency was varied. A lowpass/highpass cutoff frequency of 500 Hz provided an improvement of 40 percentage points in sentence intelligibility over unaided listening for normal-hearing listeners, while still allowing adequate localization performance. Comparison of this binaural adaptive system to traditional amplification configurations with normal-hearing listeners showed improvements in speech reception in noise in a mildly reverberant room of approximately 3 dB over simple binaural amplification and 5 dB over monaural amplification.
Daniel P. Welker, Julie E. Greenberg, Joseph G. Desloge, Patrick M. Zurek
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.4
1995 Reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids
abstract
Five techniques for reducing acoustic feedback in hearing aids were investigated: an adaptive notch filter, three previously described methods for adaptive feedback cancellation, and a novel method for feedback cancellation with adaptation during quiet intervals. Through real-time implementations, these techniques were assessed for added stable gain and sound quality. Test results showed the novel system to provide the best overall performance.>
Joseph A. Maxwell, Patrick M. Zurek
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.2
1990 Sensitivity to design parameters in an adaptive-beamforming hearing aid
abstract
The optimal performance of a two-microphone adaptive-beamforming hearing aid was analyzed under sample conditions. Using a straight-ahead target and a single off-axis jammer, source-to-microphone impulse responses were recorded from head-mounted arrays in anechoic and reverberant environments. Optimal filters (equivalent to the fully converged beamformer's adaptive filter) and associated system performance were computed for various filter structures and input target-to-jammer ratios. Generally, performance is sensitive to variations in filter length and filter primary-channel delay only under conditions of minimal reverberation and low target-to-jammer ratio. With realistic amounts of either reverberation or target, there is little sensitivity to filter length or primary channel delay.>
Patrick M. Zurek, Julie E. Greenberg, Patrick Peterson
ICASSP1