Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jürgen Schneider

dblp:29/20 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data extraction › web data extraction
wrapper generation
0.012002
ExWrap: semi-automatic wrapper generation by example · SIGIR 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

programming by example · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Texture Advection on Stream Surfaces: A Novel Hybrid Visualization Applied to CFD Simulation Results
abstract
Stream surfaces are a classic flow visualization technique used to portray the characteristics of vector fields, and texture advection research has made rapid advances in recent years. We present a novel hybrid visualization of texture advection on stream surfaces. This approach conveys properties of the vector field that stream surfaces alone cannot. We apply the visualization technique to various patterns of flow from CFD data important to automotive engine simulation including two patterns of in-cylinder flow (swirl and tumble motion) as well as flow through a cooling jacket. In addition, we explore multiple vector fields defined at the stream surface such as velocity, vorticity, and pressure gradient. The results of our investigation highlight both the strengths and limitations of the hybrid stream surface-texture advection visualization technique and offer new insight to engineers exploring and analyzing their simulations.
Robert S. Laramee, Christoph Garth, Jürgen Schneider, Helwig Hauser
EuroVis3
2005 Visual Analysis and Exploration of Fluid Flow in a Cooling Jacket
abstract
We present a visual analysis and exploration of fluid flow through a cooling jacket. Engineers invest a large amount of time and serious effort to optimize the flow through this engine component because of its important role in transferring heat away from the engine block. In this study we examine the design goals that engineers apply in order to construct an ideal-as-possible cooling jacket geometry and use a broad range of visualization tools in order to analyze, explore, and present the results. We systematically employ direct, geometric, and texture-based flow visualization techniques as well as automatic feature extraction and interactive feature-based methodology. And we discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages of these approaches as well as the challenges, both technical and perceptual with this application. The result is a feature-rich state-of-the-art flow visualization analysis applied to an important and complex data set from real-world computational fluid dynamics simulations.
Robert S. Laramee, Christoph Garth, Helmut Doleisch, Jürgen Schneider, Helwig Hauser, Hans Hagen
IEEE Visualization4
2004 Investigating Swirl and Tumble Flow with a Comparison of Visualization Techniques
abstract
We investigate two important, common fluid flow patterns from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, namely, swirl and tumble motion typical of automotive engines. We study and visualize swirl and tumble flow using three different flow visualization techniques: direct, geometric, and texture-based. When illustrating these methods side-by-side, we describe the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach within a specific spatial dimension and across multiple spatial dimensions typical of an engineer's analysis. Our study is focused on steady-state flow. Based on this investigation we offer perspectives on where and when these techniques are best applied in order to visualize the behavior of swirl and tumble motion.
Robert S. Laramee, Daniel Weiskopf, Jürgen Schneider, Helwig Hauser
IEEE Visualization3
2002 ExWrap: semi-automatic wrapper generation by example
Bethina Schmitt, Michael Christoffel, Jürgen Schneider
SIGIR3