Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thong Nguyen 0004
dblp:29/5255-4
· DBLP profile ↗
shortlisted
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
12since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0607-0723ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 9 · 4 first-author · 9 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
8 papers |
Information retrieval · 95% Knowledge graphs · 5% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 54% Trustworthy machine learning · 46% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › retrieval models › sparse retrieval
learned sparse retrieval |
5.2 | 6 | 2026 | Better than Dense? Investigating the Natural Backward Compatibility of Learned Sparse Representations · SIGIR 2026 Sparton: Fast and Memory-Efficient Triton Kernel for Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
3.5 | 4 | 2026 | Better than Dense? Investigating the Natural Backward Compatibility of Learned Sparse Representations · SIGIR 2026 Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2025 Effective Inference-Free Retrieval for Learned Sparse Representations · SIGIR 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU kernel optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Sparton: Fast and Memory-Efficient Triton Kernel for Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU kernel optimization
kernel fusion |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Sparton: Fast and Memory-Efficient Triton Kernel for Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval
cross-modal retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval
visual document retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph embedding
entity embedding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DyVo: Dynamic Vocabularies for Learned Sparse Retrieval with Entities · EMNLP 2024 |
Information retrieval
indexing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DyVo: Dynamic Vocabularies for Learned Sparse Retrieval with Entities · EMNLP 2024 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › text search
long document retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adapting Learned Sparse Retrieval for Long Documents · SIGIR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving the Generalizability of Depression Detection by Leveraging Clinical Questionnaires · ACL (1) 2022 |
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DiffIR: Exploring Differences in Ranking Models' Behavior · SIGIR 2021 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Better than Dense? Investigating the Natural Backward Compatibility of Learned Sparse Representations · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval · SIGIR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Improving the Generalizability of Depression Detection by Leveraging Clinical Questionnaires · ACL (1) 2022 |
Medical and health informatics
mental health informatics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Improving the Generalizability of Depression Detection by Leveraging Clinical Questionnaires · ACL (1) 2022 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
neural ranking model |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | DiffIR: Exploring Differences in Ranking Models' Behavior · SIGIR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
triton · 2.0tiled matrix multiplication · 2.0online reduction · 2.0zero-shot retrieval · 1.7vision-language model captioning · 1.7text embedding · 1.7PHQ9 questionnaire grounding · 1.1BERT · 1.1representation fusion · 1.0ranking fusion · 1.0adapter · 1.0pre-trained language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse Retrieval
Andrew Yates, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Cosimo Rulli, Eugene Yang 0001, Sean MacAvaney, Siddharth A. K. Singh, Thong Nguyen 0004, Yibin Lei |
ECIR (4) | 7 |
| 2026 | Sparton: Fast and Memory-Efficient Triton Kernel for Learned Sparse RetrievalabstractState-of-the-art Learned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) models, such as \splade, typically employ a Language Modeling (LM) head to project latent hidden states into a lexically-anchored logit matrix. This intermediate matrix is subsequently transformed into a sparse lexical representation through element-wise operations (ReLU, łogp) and max-pooling over the sequence dimension. Despite its effectiveness, the LM head creates a massive memory bottleneck due to the sheer size of the vocabulary (V ), which can range from 30,000 to over 250,000 tokens in recent models. Materializing this matrix creates a significant memory bottleneck, limiting model scaling. The resulting I/O overhead between operators further throttles throughput and runtime performance. In this paper, we propose SPARTON, a fast---memory-efficient---Triton kernel tailored for the LM head in LSR models. SPARTON utilizes a fused approach that integrates the tiled matrix multiplication, ReLU, Log1P, and max-reduction into a single GPU kernel. By performing an early online reduction directly on raw logit tiles, SPARTON avoids materializing the full logit matrix in memory. Our experiments demonstrate that the SPARTON kernel, in isolation, achieves up to a 4.8× speedup and an order-of-magnitude reduction in peak memory usage compared to PyTorch baselines. Integrated into SPLADE (|V | ≈ 30k ), SPARTON enables a 33% larger batch size and 14% faster training with no effectiveness loss. On a multilingual backbone (|V | ≈ 250k ), these gains jump to a 26× larger batch size and 2.5× faster training. Thong Nguyen 0004, Cosimo Rulli, Franco Maria Nardini, Rossano Venturini, Andrew Yates |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2026 | Better than Dense? Investigating the Natural Backward Compatibility of Learned Sparse RepresentationsabstractAdvancements in retrieval models necessitate re-indexing, a computationally expensive process for large-scale production environments. While updating only the query encoder and continuing to use the old index could be a promising middle ground, dense retrieval systems suffer severe performance drops in this setting. We investigate whether Learned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) can mitigate this backward compatibility issue, as its lexical matching may provide a stable term-based anchor to preserve compatibility across model versions. Experiments on BEIR and the streaming settings of LoTTE show that upgrading only the query encoder causes only a small effectiveness drop in LSR when no mitigation applied, whereas dense retrieval fails severely. We explore lightweight query adaptation methods including ranking fusion, representation fusion, and minimal-training adapters to further improve compatibility. These approaches significantly improve backward compatibility on BEIR and effectively reduce performance loss in streaming retrieval. Code: https://github.com/JingfenQiao/LSR-BC.git Jingfen Qiao, Gabrielle Poerwawinata, Thong Nguyen 0004, Jia-Huei Ju, Eugene Yang 0001, Evangelos Kanoulas, Andrew Yates |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2025 | SERVAL: Surprisingly Effective Zero-Shot Visual Document Retrieval Powered by Large Vision and Language ModelsabstractVisual Document Retrieval (VDR) typically operates as text-to-image retrieval using specialized bi-encoders trained to directly embed document images.We revisit a zero-shot generateand-encode pipeline: a vision-language model first produces a detailed textual description of each document image, which is then embedded by a standard text encoder.On the ViDoRe-v2 benchmark, the method reaches 63.4% nDCG@5, surpassing the strongest specialised multi-vector visual document encoder.It also scales better to large collections and offers broader multilingual coverage.Analysis shows that modern vision-language models capture complex textual and visual cues with sufficient granularity to act as a reusable semantic proxy.By offloading modality alignment to pretrained vision-language models, our approach removes the need for computationally intensive text-image contrastive training and establishes a strong zero-shot baseline for future VDR systems.Our code is available for reproduction at: thongnt99/serval Thong Nguyen 0004, Yibin Lei, Jia-Huei Ju, Andrew Yates |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2025 | Effective Inference-Free Retrieval for Learned Sparse RepresentationsabstractLearned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) is an effective IR approach that exploits pre-trained language models for encoding text into a learned bag of words. Several efforts in the literature have shown that sparsity is key to enabling a good trade-off between the efficiency and effectiveness of the query processor. To induce the right degree of sparsity, researchers typically use regularization techniques when training LSR models. Recently, new efficient-inverted index-based-retrieval engines have been proposed, leading to a natural question: has the role of regularization changed in training LSR models? In this paper, we conduct an extended evaluation of regularization approaches for LSR where we discuss their effectiveness, efficiency, and out-of-domain generalization capabilities. We first show that regularization can be relaxed to produce more effective LSR en- coders. We also show that query encoding is now the bottleneck limiting the overall query processor performance. To remove this bottleneck, we advance the state-of-the-art of inference-free LSR by proposing Learned Inference-free Retrieval (Li-Lsr). At training time, Li-Lsr learns a score for each token, casting the query encoding step into a seamless table lookup. Our approach yields state-of-the-art effectiveness for both in-domain and out-of-domain evaluation,surpassing Splade-v3-Doc by 1 point of mRR@10 on MsMarco and 1.8 points of nDCG@10 on Beir. Franco Maria Nardini, Thong Nguyen 0004, Cosimo Rulli, Rossano Venturini, Andrew Yates |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2025 | Neural Lexical Search with Learned Sparse RetrievalabstractLearned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) techniques use neural machinery to represent queries and documents as learned bags of words. In contrast with other neural retrieval techniques, such as generative retrieval and dense retrieval, LSR has been shown to be a remarkably robust, transferable, and efficient family of methods for retrieving high-quality search results. This half-day tutorial aims to provide an extensive overview of LSR, ranging from its fundamentals to the latest emerging techniques. By the end of the tutorial, attendees will be familiar with the important design decisions of an LSR system, know how to apply them to text and other modalities, and understand the latest techniques for retrieving with them efficiently. Website: https://lsr-tutorial.github.io Andrew Yates, Carlos Eduardo Rosar Kós Lassance, Cosimo Rulli, Eugene Yang 0001, Sean MacAvaney, Siddharth A. K. Singh, Thong Nguyen 0004, Yibin Lei |
SIGIR | 7 |
| 2024 | Multimodal Learned Sparse Retrieval with Probabilistic Expansion Control
Thong Nguyen 0004, Mariya Hendriksen, Andrew Yates, Maarten de Rijke |
ECIR (2) | 1 |
| 2024 | DyVo: Dynamic Vocabularies for Learned Sparse Retrieval with EntitiesabstractLearned Sparse Retrieval (LSR) models use vocabularies from pre-trained transformers, which often split entities into nonsensical fragments.Splitting entities can reduce retrieval accuracy and limits the model's ability to incorporate up-to-date world knowledge not included in the training data.In this work, we enhance the LSR vocabulary with Wikipedia concepts and entities, enabling the model to resolve ambiguities more effectively and stay current with evolving knowledge.Central to our approach is a Dynamic Vocabulary (DyVo) head, which leverages existing entity embeddings and an entity retrieval component that identifies entities relevant to a query or document.We use the DyVo head to generate entity weights, which are then merged with word piece weights to create joint representations for efficient indexing and retrieval using an inverted index.In experiments across three entity-rich document ranking datasets, the resulting DyVo model substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.1 Thong Nguyen 0004, Shubham Chatterjee, Sean MacAvaney, Iain Mackie, Jeff Dalton 0001, Andrew Yates |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | A Unified Framework for Learned Sparse Retrieval
Thong Nguyen 0004, Sean MacAvaney, Andrew Yates |
ECIR (3) | 1 |
| 2023 | Adapting Learned Sparse Retrieval for Long DocumentsabstractLearned sparse retrieval (LSR) is a family of neural retrieval methods that transform queries and documents into sparse weight vectors aligned with a vocabulary. While LSR approaches like Splade work well for short passages, it is unclear how well they handle longer documents. We investigate existing aggregation approaches for adapting LSR to longer documents and find that proximal scoring is crucial for LSR to handle long documents. To leverage this property, we proposed two adaptations of the Sequential Dependence Model (SDM) to LSR: ExactSDM and SoftSDM. ExactSDM assumes only exact query term dependence, while SoftSDM uses potential functions that model the dependence of query terms and their expansion terms (i.e., terms identified using a transformer's masked language modeling head). Thong Nguyen 0004, Sean MacAvaney, Andrew Yates |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2022 | Improving the Generalizability of Depression Detection by Leveraging Clinical QuestionnairesabstractAutomated methods have been widely used to identify and analyze mental health conditions (e.g., depression) from various sources of information, including social media.Yet, deployment of such models in real-world healthcare applications faces challenges including poor out-of-domain generalization and lack of trust in black box models.In this work, we propose approaches for depression detection that are constrained to different degrees by the presence of symptoms described in PHQ9, a questionnaire used by clinicians in the depression screening process.In dataset-transfer experiments on three social media datasets, we find that grounding the model in PHQ9's symptoms substantially improves its ability to generalize to out-of-distribution data compared to a standard BERT-based approach.Furthermore, this approach can still perform competitively on indomain data.These results and our qualitative analyses suggest that grounding model predictions in clinically-relevant symptoms can improve generalizability while producing a model that is easier to inspect. Thong Nguyen 0004, Andrew Yates, Ayah Zirikly, Bart Desmet, Arman Cohan |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | DiffIR: Exploring Differences in Ranking Models' BehaviorabstractUnderstanding and comparing the behavior of retrieval models is a fundamental challenge that requires going beyond examining average effectiveness and per-query metrics, because these do not reveal key differences in how ranking models' behavior impacts individual results. DiffIR is a new open-source web tool to assist with qualitative ranking analysis by visually 'diffing' system rankings at the individual result level for queries where behavior significantly diverges. Using one of several configurable similarity measures, it identifies queries for which the rankings of models compared have important differences in individual rankings and provides a visual web interface to compare the rankings side-by-side. DiffIR additionally supports a model-specific visualization approach based on custom term importance weight files. These support studying the behavior of interpretable models, such as neural retrieval methods that produce document scores based on a similarity matrix or based on a single document passage. Observations from this tool can complement neural probing approaches like ABNIRML to generate quantitative tests. We provide an illustrative use case of DiffIR by studying the qualitative differences between recently developed neural ranking models on a standard TREC benchmark dataset. Kevin Martin Jose, Thong Nguyen 0004, Sean MacAvaney, Jeff Dalton 0001, Andrew Yates |
SIGIR | 2 |