Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timothy Praditia
dblp:290/1786
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3619-9122ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2022 Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural Networks · ICML 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
u-net · 0.6physics-informed neural networks · 0.6neural network · 0.6gradient-based inverse method · 0.6fourier neural operator · 0.6finite volume method · 0.6compositional modeling · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Inferring Underwater Topography with Finite Volume Neural NetworksabstractPartial differential equations (PDEs) find applications across various scientific and engineering fields.There is a growing trend for integrating physics-aware machine learning models to solve PDEs.Among them, the Finite Volume Neural Network (FINN) has proven to be efficient in uncovering latent structures in data.This study explores the capabilities of FINN in the investigation of shallow-water equations, which simulate wave dynamics in coastal regions.Specifically, we investigate the efficacy of FINN in reconstructing underwater topography.We find that FINN excels at inferring topography solely from wave dynamics, stressing the importance of application-specific inductive bias in neural network architectures. Cosku Can Horuz, Matthias Karlbauer, Timothy Praditia, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, Sebastian Otte |
ESANN | 3 |
| 2023 | The deep arbitrary polynomial chaos neural network or how Deep Artificial Neural Networks could benefit from data-driven homogeneous chaos theory
Sergey Oladyshkin, Timothy Praditia, Ilja Kröker, Farid Mohammadi, Wolfgang Nowak, Sebastian Otte |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 2022 | Infering Boundary Conditions in Finite Volume Neural Networks
Cosku Can Horuz, Matthias Karlbauer, Timothy Praditia, Martin V. Butz, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, Sebastian Otte |
ICANN (1) | 3 |
| 2022 | Composing Partial Differential Equations with Physics-Aware Neural NetworksabstractWe introduce a compositional physics-aware FInite volume Neural Network (FINN) for learning spatiotemporal advection-diffusion processes. FINN implements a new way of combining the learning abilities of artificial neural networks with physical and structural knowledge from numerical simulation by modeling the constituents of partial differential equations (PDEs) in a compositional manner. Results on both one- and two-dimensional PDEs (Burgers’, diffusion-sorption, diffusion-reaction, Allen{–}Cahn) demonstrate FINN’s superior modeling accuracy and excellent out-of-distribution generalization ability beyond initial and boundary conditions. With only one tenth of the number of parameters on average, FINN outperforms pure machine learning and other state-of-the-art physics-aware models in all cases{—}often even by multiple orders of magnitude. Moreover, FINN outperforms a calibrated physical model when approximating sparse real-world data in a diffusion-sorption scenario, confirming its generalization abilities and showing explanatory potential by revealing the unknown retardation factor of the observed process. Matthias Karlbauer, Timothy Praditia, Sebastian Otte, Sergey Oladyshkin, Wolfgang Nowak, Martin V. Butz |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine LearningabstractMachine learning-based modeling of physical systems has experienced increased interest in recent years. Despite some impressive progress, there is still a lack of benchmarks for Scientific ML that are easy to use but still challenging and repre- sentative of a wide range of problems. We introduce PDEBENCH, a benchmark suite of time-dependent simulation tasks based on Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). PDEBENCH comprises both code and data to benchmark the performance of novel machine learning models against both classical numerical simulations and machine learning baselines. Our proposed set of benchmark problems con- tribute the following unique features: (1) A much wider range of PDEs compared to existing benchmarks, ranging from relatively common examples to more real- istic and difficult problems; (2) much larger ready-to-use datasets compared to prior work, comprising multiple simulation runs across a larger number of ini- tial and boundary conditions and PDE parameters; (3) more extensible source codes with user-friendly APIs for data generation and baseline results with popular machine learning models (FNO, U-Net, PINN, Gradient-Based Inverse Method). PDEBENCH allows researchers to extend the benchmark freely for their own pur- poses using a standardized API and to compare the performance of new models to existing baseline methods. We also propose new evaluation metrics with the aim to provide a more holistic understanding of learning methods in the context of Scientific ML. With those metrics we identify tasks which are challenging for recent ML methods and propose these tasks as future challenges for the community. The code is available at https://github.com/pdebench/PDEBench. Makoto Takamoto, Timothy Praditia, Raphael Leiteritz, Daniel MacKinlay, Francesco Alesiani, Dirk Pflüger, Mathias Niepert |
NeurIPS | 2 |