Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junhyung Lyle Kim

dblp:290/2228 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 45% Quantum computing and quantum information · 35% Algorithms and data structures · 13%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 62% Reinforcement learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 18%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
1.922026
A Catalyst Framework for the Quantum Linear System Problem via the Proximal Point Algorithm · AAAI 2026
Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
proximal point method
1.012026
A Catalyst Framework for the Quantum Linear System Problem via the Proximal Point Algorithm · AAAI 2026
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum linear systems
1.012026
A Catalyst Framework for the Quantum Linear System Problem via the Proximal Point Algorithm · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › temporal difference learning
bellman residual minimization
0.912025
Solving hidden monotone variational inequalities with surrogate losses · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variational inequality
0.912025
Solving hidden monotone variational inequalities with surrogate losses · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.912025
Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum semidefinite programming
0.912025
Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.912025
Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization
0.912025
Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
adaptive step size
0.812024
Adaptive Federated Learning with Auto-Tuned Clients · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.812024
Adaptive Federated Learning with Auto-Tuned Clients · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.812024
Adaptive Federated Learning with Auto-Tuned Clients · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization
deflation method
0.812024
On the Error-Propagation of Inexact Hotelling's Deflation for Principal Component Analysis · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
eigenvalue problem
0.812024
On the Error-Propagation of Inexact Hotelling's Deflation for Principal Component Analysis · ICML 2024
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › convolutional codes › error propagation
error propagation analysis
0.812024
On the Error-Propagation of Inexact Hotelling's Deflation for Principal Component Analysis · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures
numerical linear algebra
0.812024
On the Error-Propagation of Inexact Hotelling's Deflation for Principal Component Analysis · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.812024
On the Error-Propagation of Inexact Hotelling's Deflation for Principal Component Analysis · ICML 2024
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum speedup
0.312026
A Catalyst Framework for the Quantum Linear System Problem via the Proximal Point Algorithm · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization
0.312025
Solving hidden monotone variational inequalities with surrogate losses · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proximal point algorithm · 1.0preconditioning · 1.0iterative framework · 1.0surrogate loss · 0.9mirror prox · 0.9mirror descent · 0.9dual averaging · 0.9adam · 0.9TD(0) · 0.9power iteration · 0.8local smoothness adaptation · 0.8hotelling's deflation · 0.8SGD step size rule · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Catalyst Framework for the Quantum Linear System Problem via the Proximal Point Algorithm
abstract
Solving systems of linear equations is a fundamental problem, but it can be computationally intensive for classical algorithms in high dimensions. Existing quantum algorithms can achieve exponential speedups for the quantum linear system problem (QLSP) in terms of the problem dimension, but the advantage is bottlenecked by condition number of the coefficient matrix. In this work, we propose a new quantum algorithm for QLSP inspired by the classical proximal point algorithm (PPA). Our proposed method can be viewed as a meta-algorithm that allows inverting a modified matrix via an existing QLSP solver, thereby directly approximating the solution vector instead of approximating the inverse of the coefficient matrix. By carefully choosing the step size eta, the proposed algorithm can effectively precondition the linear system to mitigate the dependence on condition numbers that hindered the applicability of previous approaches. Importantly, this is the first iterative framework for QLSP where a tunable parameter eta and initialization x_0 allows controlling the trade-off between the runtime and approximation error.
Junhyung Lyle Kim, Nai-Hui Chia, Anastasios Kyrillidis
AAAI1
2025 Solving hidden monotone variational inequalities with surrogate losses
abstract
Deep learning has proven to be effective in a wide variety of loss minimization problems. However, many applications of interest, like minimizing projected Bellman error and min-max optimization, cannot be modelled as minimizing a scalar loss function but instead correspond to solving a variational inequality (VI) problem. This difference in setting has caused many practical challenges as naive gradient-based approaches from supervised learning tend to diverge and cycle in the VI case. In this work, we propose a principled surrogate-based approach compatible with deep learning to solve VIs. We show that our surrogate-based approach has three main benefits: (1) under assumptions that are realistic in practice (when hidden monotone structure is present, interpolation, and sufficient optimization of the surrogates), it guarantees convergence, (2) it provides a unifying perspective of existing methods, and (3) is amenable to existing deep learning optimizers like ADAM. Experimentally, we demonstrate our surrogate-based approach is effective in min-max optimization and minimizing projected Bellman error. Furthermore, in the deep reinforcement learning case, we propose a novel variant of TD(0) which is more compute and sample efficient.
Ryan D'Orazio, Danilo Vucetic, Zichu Liu, Junhyung Lyle Kim, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Gauthier Gidel
ICLR4
2025 Fast Zeroth-Order Convex Optimization with Quantum Gradient Methods
abstract
We study quantum algorithms based on quantum (sub)gradient estimation using noisy function evaluation oracles, and demonstrate the first dimension-independent query complexities (up to poly-logarithmic factors) for zeroth-order convex optimization in both smooth and nonsmooth settings. Interestingly, only using noisy function evaluation oracles, we match the first-order query complexities of classical gradient descent, thereby exhibiting exponential separation between quantum and classical zeroth-order optimization. We then generalize these algorithms to work in non-Euclidean settings by using quantum (sub)gradient estimation to instantiate mirror descent and its variants, including dual averaging and mirror prox. By leveraging a connection between semidefinite programming and eigenvalue optimization, we use our quantum mirror descent method to give a new quantum algorithm for solving semidefinite programs, linear programs, and zero-sum games. We identify a parameter regime in which our zero-sum games algorithm is faster than any existing classical or quantum approach.
Junhyung Lyle Kim, Brandon Augustino, Dylan Herman, Enrico Fontana, Jacob Watkins, Marco Pistoia, Shouvanik Chakrabarti
NeurIPS1
2024 Adaptive Federated Learning with Auto-Tuned Clients
abstract
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning framework where the global model of a central server is trained via multiple collaborative steps by participating clients without sharing their data. While being a flexible framework, where the distribution of local data, participation rate, and computing power of each client can greatly vary, such flexibility gives rise to many new challenges, especially in the hyperparameter tuning on the client side. We propose $\Delta$-SGD, a simple step size rule for SGD that enables each client to use its own step size by adapting to the local smoothness of the function each client is optimizing. We provide theoretical and empirical results where the benefit of the client adaptivity is shown in various FL scenarios.
Junhyung Lyle Kim, Mohammad Taha Toghani, César A. Uribe, Anastasios Kyrillidis
ICLR1
2024 On the Error-Propagation of Inexact Hotelling's Deflation for Principal Component Analysis
abstract
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) aims to find subspaces spanned by the so-called *principal components* that best represent the variance in the dataset. The deflation method is a popular meta-algorithm that sequentially finds individual principal components, starting from the most important ones and working towards the less important ones. However, as deflation proceeds, numerical errors from the imprecise estimation of principal components propagate due to its sequential nature. This paper mathematically characterizes the error propagation of the inexact Hotelling's deflation method. We consider two scenarios: $i)$ when the sub-routine for finding the leading eigenvector is abstract and can represent various algorithms; and $ii)$ when power iteration is used as the sub-routine. In the latter case, the additional directional information from power iteration allows us to obtain a tighter error bound than the sub-routine agnostic case. For both scenarios, we explicitly characterize how the errors progress and affect subsequent principal component estimations.
Fangshuo Liao, Junhyung Lyle Kim, Cruz Barnum, Anastasios Kyrillidis
ICML2