Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noa Marelly
dblp:292/2809
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fault Tolerant Max-Cut · ICALP 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
LP-based approximation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fault Tolerant Max-Cut · ICALP 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random hyperplane rounding · 0.5multi-objective optimization · 0.5ellipsoid algorithm · 0.5LP duality · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Fault Tolerant Max-CutabstractIn this work, we initiate the study of fault tolerant Max Cut, where given an edge-weighted undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, the goal is to find a cut $S\subseteq V$ that maximizes the total weight of edges that cross $S$ even after an adversary removes $k$ vertices from $G$. We consider two types of adversaries: an adaptive adversary that sees the outcome of the random coin tosses used by the algorithm, and an oblivious adversary that does not. For any constant number of failures $k$ we present an approximation of $(0.878-ε)$ against an adaptive adversary and of $α_{GW}\approx 0.8786$ against an oblivious adversary (here $α_{GW}$ is the approximation achieved by the random hyperplane algorithm of [Goemans-Williamson J. ACM `95]). Additionally, we present a hardness of approximation of $α_{GW}$ against both types of adversaries, rendering our results (virtually) tight. The non-linear nature of the fault tolerant objective makes the design and analysis of algorithms harder when compared to the classic Max Cut. Hence, we employ approaches ranging from multi-objective optimization to LP duality and the ellipsoid algorithm to obtain our results. Keren Censor-Hillel, Noa Marelly, Roy Schwartz 0002, Tigran Tonoyan |
ICALP | 2 |