Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aashiq Muhamed

dblp:294/0107 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8657-0439ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Generative modeling · 22%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 44% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 44% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in Sparse Autoencoders · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
1.012026
Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in Sparse Autoencoders · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
1.012026
Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in Sparse Autoencoders · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training
0.812024
GRASS: Compute Efficient Low-Memory LLM Training with Structured Sparse Gradients · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.812024
GRASS: Compute Efficient Low-Memory LLM Training with Structured Sparse Gradients · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
0.812024
GRASS: Compute Efficient Low-Memory LLM Training with Structured Sparse Gradients · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.812024
Adversarial Text to Continuous Image Generation · CVPR 2024
High-performance computing
large-scale training
0.712023
Training Large-scale Foundation Models on Emerging AI Chips · KDD 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.512021
Symbolic Music Generation with Transformer-GANs · AAAI 2021
Audio and music processing
music generation
0.512021
Symbolic Music Generation with Transformer-GANs · AAAI 2021
Audio and music processing › music generation
symbolic music generation
0.512021
Symbolic Music Generation with Transformer-GANs · AAAI 2021
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.212023
Training Large-scale Foundation Models on Emerging AI Chips · KDD 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.112021
Symbolic Music Generation with Transformer-GANs · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse autoencoder · 1.0pairwise dictionary mean correlation coefficient · 1.0gumbel-softmax · 1.0Span-BERT · 1.0GAN · 1.0word-level attention · 0.8mixed-precision training · 0.8low-rank projection · 0.8hypernetwork weight modulation · 0.8gradient sparsification · 0.8mixed precision training · 0.7distributed training · 0.7transformer · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in Sparse Autoencoders
abstract
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are a prominent tool in mechanistic interpretability (MI) for decomposing neural network activations into interpretable features. However, the aspiration to identify a canonical set of features is challenged by the observed inconsistency of learned SAE features across different training runs, undermining reproducibility and complicating model comparison. We study run-to-run feature consistency in SAEs and argue that it should be reported as a standard evaluation axis alongside reconstruction and sparsity. We propose the Pairwise Dictionary Mean Correlation Coefficient (PW-MCC) as an assignment-based metric to quantify consistency and demonstrate that high levels are achievable (PW-MCC ≈ 0.80 for TopK SAEs on LLM activations) with appropriate architectural choices.Our contributions include: (i) theoretical grounding for strong consistency in the idealized setting of TopK SAEs; (ii) synthetic validation using a model organism, which verifies PW-MCC as a reliable proxy for ground-truth recovery; and (iii) empirical analysis on LLM activations, where PW-MCC correlates with the similarity of automatically generated natural-language feature explanations.
Xiangchen Song, Aashiq Muhamed, Yujia Zheng 0001, Zeyu Tang 0002, Mona T. Diab, Virginia Smith, Kun Zhang 0001
ACL (1)2
2024 Adversarial Text to Continuous Image Generation
abstract
Existing GAN-based text-to-image models treat images as 2D pixel arrays. In this paper, we approach the text-to-image task from a different perspective, where a 2D image is represented as an implicit neural representation (INR). We show that straightforward conditioning of the unconditional INR-based GAN method on text inputs is not enough to achieve good performance. We propose a word-level attention-based weight modulation operator that controls the generation process of INR-GAN based on hypernetworks. Our experiments on benchmark datasets show that HyperCGAN achieves competitive performance to existing pixel-based methods and retains the properties of continuous generative models. Project page link: https://kilichbek.github.io/webpagelhypercgan.
Kilichbek Haydarov, Aashiq Muhamed, Xiaoqian Shen, Jovana Lazarevic, Ivan Skorokhodov, Chamuditha Jayanga Galappaththige, Mohamed Elhoseiny 0001
CVPR2
2024 GRASS: Compute Efficient Low-Memory LLM Training with Structured Sparse Gradients
abstract
Large language model (LLM) training and finetuning are often bottlenecked by limited GPU memory.While existing projection-based optimization methods address this by projecting gradients into a lower-dimensional subspace to reduce optimizer state memory, they typically rely on dense projection matrices, which can introduce computational and memory overheads.In this work, we propose GRASS (GRAdient Stuctured Sparsification), a novel approach that leverages sparse projections to transform gradients into structured sparse updates.This design not only significantly reduces memory usage for optimizer states but also minimizes gradient memory footprint, computation, and communication costs, leading to substantial throughput improvements.Extensive experiments on pretraining and finetuning tasks demonstrate that GRASS achieves competitive performance to full-rank training and existing projection-based methods.Notably, GRASS enables half-precision pretraining of a 13B parameter LLaMA model on a single 40GB A100 GPU-a feat infeasible for previous methodsand yields up to a 2× throughput improvement on an 8-GPU system.Code is released here 1 .P ← compute P (∇L(W (t) )) ▷ P ∈ R m×r 8: // [Optional] Update optimizer state 9:
Aashiq Muhamed, Oscar Li, David P. Woodruff, Mona T. Diab, Virginia Smith
EMNLP1
2023 Training Large-scale Foundation Models on Emerging AI Chips
abstract
Foundation models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have garnered significant interest from both academia and industry due to their emergent capabilities, such as few-shot prompting, multi-step reasoning, instruction following, and model calibration. Such capabilities were previously only attainable with specially designed models, such as those using knowledge graphs, but can now be achieved on a much larger scale with foundation models. As the capabilities of foundation models have increased, so too have their sizes at a rate much faster than Moore's law. For example, the BERT large model was initially released as a 334M model in 2018, and by 2023, the largest GPT-4 models are estimated to range between 200-300B, representing an increase of three orders of magnitude in just five years. The training of foundation models requires massive computing power. For instance, training a BERT model on a single state-of-the-art GPU machine with multi-A100 chips can take several days, while training GPT-3 models on a large multi-instance GPU cluster can take several months to complete the estimated 3 X 1023 flops.
Aashiq Muhamed, Christian Bock, Rahul Solanki, Youngsuk Park, Yida Wang 0003, Jun Huan
KDD1
2023 Web-Scale Semantic Product Search with Large Language Models
abstract
Abstract Dense embedding-based semantic matching is widely used in e-commerce product search to address the shortcomings of lexical matching such as sensitivity to spelling variants. The recent advances in BERT-like language model encoders, have however, not found their way to realtime search due to the strict inference latency requirement imposed on e-commerce websites. While bi-encoder BERT architectures enable fast approximate nearest neighbor search, training them effectively on query-product data remains a challenge due to training instabilities and the persistent generalization gap with cross-encoders. In this work, we propose a four-stage training procedure to leverage large BERT-like models for product search while preserving low inference latency. We introduce query-product interaction pre-finetuning to effectively pretrain BERT bi-encoders for matching and improve generalization. Through offline experiments on an e-commerce product dataset, we show that a distilled small BERT-based model (75M params) trained using our approach improves the search relevance metric by up to 23% over a baseline DSSM-based model with similar inference latency. The small model only suffers a 3% drop in relevance metric compared to the 20x larger teacher. We also show using online A/B tests at scale, that our approach improves over the production model in exact and substitute products retrieved.
Aashiq Muhamed, Sriram Srinivasan 0004, Choon Hui Teo, Qingjun Cui, Belinda Zeng, Trishul Chilimbi, S. V. N. Vishwanathan
PAKDD (3)1
2021 Symbolic Music Generation with Transformer-GANs
abstract
Autoregressive models using Transformers have emerged as the dominant approach for music generation with the goal of synthesizing minute-long compositions that exhibit large-scale musical structure. These models are commonly trained by minimizing the negative log-likelihood (NLL) of the observed sequence in an autoregressive manner. Unfortunately, the quality of samples from these models tends to degrade significantly for long sequences, a phenomenon attributed to exposure bias. Fortunately, we are able to detect these failures with classifiers trained to distinguish between real and sampled sequences, an observation that motivates our exploration of adversarial losses to complement the NLL objective. We use a pre-trained Span-BERT model for the discriminator of the GAN, which in our experiments helped with training stability. We use the Gumbel-Softmax trick to obtain a differentiable approximation of the sampling process. This makes discrete sequences amenable to optimization in GANs. In addition, we break the sequences into smaller chunks to ensure that we stay within a given memory budget. We demonstrate via human evaluations and a new discriminative metric that the music generated by our approach outperforms a baseline trained with likelihood maximization, the state-of-the-art Music Transformer, and other GANs used for sequence generation. 57% of people prefer music generated via our approach while 43% prefer Music Transformer.
Aashiq Muhamed, Xingjian Shi, Suri Yaddanapudi, Wayne Chi, Dylan Jackson, Rahul Suresh, Zachary C. Lipton, Alexander J. Smola
AAAI1