Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Setu Gupta

dblp:294/9250 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9537-8417ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
cache
0.912025
Light-weight Cache Replacement for Instruction Heavy Workloads · ISCA 2025
Memory systems › cache management
cache replacement
0.912025
Light-weight Cache Replacement for Instruction Heavy Workloads · ISCA 2025
Memory systems › cache management › cache replacement
last-level cache replacement
0.912025
Light-weight Cache Replacement for Instruction Heavy Workloads · ISCA 2025
Memory systems › cache management
re-reference interval prediction
0.912025
Light-weight Cache Replacement for Instruction Heavy Workloads · ISCA 2025
Memory systems › cache
prefetching
0.312025
Light-weight Cache Replacement for Instruction Heavy Workloads · ISCA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exhaustive policy search · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Light-weight Cache Replacement for Instruction Heavy Workloads
abstract
The last-level cache (LLC) is the last chance for memory accesses from the processor to avoid the costly latency of accessing the main memory.In recent years, an increasing number of instruction heavy workloads have put pressure on the last-level cache.We find that, for instruction heavy workloads, a simple replacement policy with minimal overhead provides at least the same benefit as a stateof-the-art, high-overhead replacement policy in the presence of aggressive prefetching.Our proposal is based on specifying insertion and promotion vectors (IPVs) as a generalization of re-reference interval prediction (RRIP) in such a way that the space of feasible policies may be searched exhaustively to find the best policy for the training set of workloads.The policies are formulated to deliver the best performance taking into account demand and prefetch accesses.We show that our technique, Prefetch Aware Coarse-grained Insertion and Promotion Vectors (PACIPV), improves performance over a state-of-the-art LLC replacement policy (Mockingjay) for instruction heavy workloads, and remains competitive for data heavy workloads with significantly less hardware overhead.We show that RRIP-based IPVs are very easy to implement but outperform far more complex replacement policies.PACIPV achieves a speedup of 3.3% over the baseline of LRU, outperforming SRRIP by 1.1% and the much more hardware intensive Mockingjay by 0.1%.
Saba Mostofi, Setu Gupta, Ahmad Hassani, Krishnam Tibrewala, Elvira Teran, Paul Gratz, Daniel A. Jiménez
ISCA2