Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vishal Asnani
dblp:295/8698
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8863-673XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
5 papers |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Generative modeling · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Graph learning · 25% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
2.9 | 4 | 2025 | Your Text Encoder Can Be an Object-Level Watermarking Controller · ICCV 2025 ProMark: Proactive Diffusion Watermarking for Causal Attribution · CVPR 2024 MaLP: Manipulation Localization Using a Proactive Scheme · CVPR 2023 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics › image forensics
image forgery detection |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | MaLP: Manipulation Localization Using a Proactive Scheme · CVPR 2023 Proactive Image Manipulation Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tracing Hyperparameter Dependencies for Model Parsing via Learnable Graph Pooling Network · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph pooling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tracing Hyperparameter Dependencies for Model Parsing via Learnable Graph Pooling Network · NeurIPS 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › generative model watermarking
diffusion model watermarking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ProMark: Proactive Diffusion Watermarking for Causal Attribution · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
camouflaged object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PrObeD: Proactive Object Detection Wrapper · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PrObeD: Proactive Object Detection Wrapper · NeurIPS 2023 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
deepfake detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Reverse Engineering of Generative Models: Inferring Model Hyperparameters From Generated Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics › image forensics
image manipulation localization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MaLP: Manipulation Localization Using a Proactive Scheme · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › trustworthy generative modeling
model attribution |
0.6 | 3 | 2023 | Reverse Engineering of Generative Models: Inferring Model Hyperparameters From Generated Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 MaLP: Manipulation Localization Using a Proactive Scheme · CVPR 2023 Proactive Image Manipulation Detection · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Proactive Schemes: A Survey of Adversarial Attacks for Social Good · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Proactive Schemes: A Survey of Adversarial Attacks for Social Good · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ProMark: Proactive Diffusion Watermarking for Causal Attribution · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ProMark: Proactive Diffusion Watermarking for Causal Attribution · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
template learning · 2.0text encoder · 1.7imperceptible watermark embedding · 1.5diffusion model training · 1.5two-branch architecture · 1.3survey · 1.0learnable pooling-unpooling · 0.8graph node classification · 0.8generation trace capturing · 0.8parsing network · 0.7fingerprint estimation network · 0.7encoder-decoder · 0.7template estimation · 0.6constraint-based optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | NRGMark: Localized Watermarking for Energy Transparency in ImagesabstractWe present NRGMark, a region-based image watermarking framework to embed provenance metadata into composite graphic designs such as posters. NRGMark enables imperceptible watermarking of distinct visual elements each carrying independent metadata on aspects like environmental impact, such as the energy consumption associated with generative AI (GenAI) use. NRGMark extends image watermark encoder-decoder models by incorporating an object localization network to detect and decode multiple watermarked regions within a document, even under image transformations and physical print–scan degradation. NRGMark interoperates with several watermarking techniques and the emerging C2PA open standard for media provenance to encode environmental impact metadata. We demonstrate NRGMark on both synthetic and real-world design layouts, illustrating its potential to support energy transparency in the age of GenAI. Shruti Agarwal, Élie Michel, Vishal Asnani, Tania Mathern, John P. Collomosse |
WACV | 3 |
| 2026 | Proactive Schemes: A Survey of Adversarial Attacks for Social Good
Vishal Asnani, Xi Yin 0001, Xiaoming Liu 0002 |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2025 | Your Text Encoder Can Be an Object-Level Watermarking Controller
Naresh Kumar Devulapally, Mingzhen Huang, Vishal Asnani, Shruti Agarwal, Siwei Lyu, Vishnu Suresh Lokhande |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2024 | ProMark: Proactive Diffusion Watermarking for Causal AttributionabstractGenerative AI (GenAI) is transforming creative work-flows through the capability to synthesize and manipulate images via high-level prompts. Yet creatives are not well supported to receive recognition or reward for the use of their content in GenAI training. To this end, we propose ProMark, a causal attribution technique to attribute a synthetically generated image to its training data concepts like objects, motifs, templates, artists, or styles. The concept information is proactively embedded into the input training images using imperceptible watermarks, and the diffusion models (unconditional or conditional) are trained to retain the corresponding watermarks in generated images. We show that we can embed as many as 216unique water-marks into the training data, and each training image can contain more than one watermark. ProMark can maintain image quality whilst outperforming correlation-based attribution. Finally, several qualitative examples are presented, providing the confidence that the presence of the watermark conveys a causative relationship between training data and synthetic images. Vishal Asnani, John P. Collomosse, Tu Bui, Xiaoming Liu 0002, Shruti Agarwal |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | Tracing Hyperparameter Dependencies for Model Parsing via Learnable Graph Pooling Networkabstract\textit{Model Parsing} defines the task of predicting hyperparameters of the generative model (GM), given a GM-generated image as the input.
Since a diverse set of hyperparameters is jointly employed by the generative model, and dependencies often exist among them, it is crucial to learn these hyperparameter dependencies for improving the model parsing performance.
To explore such important dependencies, we propose a novel model parsing method called Learnable Graph Pooling Network (LGPN), in which we formulate model parsing as a graph node classification problem, using graph nodes and edges to represent hyperparameters and their dependencies, respectively.
Furthermore, LGPN incorporates a learnable pooling-unpooling mechanism tailored to model parsing, which adaptively learns hyperparameter dependencies of GMs used to generate the input image.
Also, we introduce a Generation Trace Capturing Network (GTC) that can efficiently identify generation traces of input images, enhancing the understanding of generated images' provenances.
Empirically, we achieve state-of-the-art performance in model parsing and its extended applications, showing the superiority of the proposed LGPN. Vishal Asnani, Sijia Liu 0001, Xiaoming Liu 0002 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | MaLP: Manipulation Localization Using a Proactive SchemeabstractAdvancements in the generation quality of various Generative Models (GMs) has made it necessary to not only perform binary manipulation detection but also localize the modified pixels in an image. However, prior works termed as passive for manipulation localization exhibit poor generalization performance over unseen GMs and attribute modifications. To combat this issue, we propose a proactive scheme for manipulation localization, termed MaLP. We encrypt the real images by adding a learned template. If the image is manipulated by any GM, this added protection from the template not only aids binary detection but also helps in identifying the pixels modified by the GM. The template is learned by leveraging local and global-level features estimated by a two-branch architecture. We show that MaLP performs better than prior passive works. We also show the generalizability of MaLP by testing on 22 different GMs, providing a benchmark for future research on manipulation localization. Finally, we show that MaLP can be used as a discriminator for improving the generation quality of GMs. Our models/codes are available at www.github.com/vishal3477/pro_loc. Vishal Asnani, Xi Yin 0001, Tal Hassner, Xiaoming Liu 0002 |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2023 | PrObeD: Proactive Object Detection WrapperabstractPrevious research in $2D$ object detection focuses on various tasks, including detecting objects in generic and camouflaged images. These works are regarded as passive works for object detection as they take the input image as is. However, convergence to global minima is not guaranteed to be optimal in neural networks; therefore, we argue that the trained weights in the object detector are not optimal. To rectify this problem, we propose a wrapper based on proactive schemes, PrObeD, which enhances the performance of these object detectors by learning a signal. PrObeD consists of an encoder-decoder architecture, where the encoder network generates an image-dependent signal termed templates to encrypt the input images, and the decoder recovers this template from the encrypted images. We propose that learning the optimum template results in an object detector with an improved detection performance. The template acts as a mask to the input images to highlight semantics useful for the object detector. Finetuning the object detector with these encrypted images enhances the detection performance for both generic and camouflaged. Our experiments on MS-COCO, CAMO, COD$10$K, and NC$4$K datasets show improvement over different detectors after applying PrObeD. Our models/codes are available at https://github.com/vishal3477/Proactive-Object-Detection. Vishal Asnani, Abhinav Kumar 0004, Suya You, Xiaoming Liu 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Reverse Engineering of Generative Models: Inferring Model Hyperparameters From Generated ImagesabstractState-of-the-art (SOTA) Generative Models (GMs) can synthesize photo-realistic images that are hard for humans to distinguish from genuine photos. Identifying and understanding manipulated media are crucial to mitigate the social concerns on the potential misuse of GMs. We propose to perform reverse engineering of GMs to infer model hyperparameters from the images generated by these models. We define a novel problem, "model parsing", as estimating GM network architectures and training loss functions by examining their generated images - a task seemingly impossible for human beings. To tackle this problem, we propose a framework with two components: a Fingerprint Estimation Network (FEN), which estimates a GM fingerprint from a generated image by training with four constraints to encourage the fingerprint to have desired properties, and a Parsing Network (PN), which predicts network architecture and loss functions from the estimated fingerprints. To evaluate our approach, we collect a fake image dataset with 100 K images generated by 116 different GMs. Extensive experiments show encouraging results in parsing the hyperparameters of the unseen models. Finally, our fingerprint estimation can be leveraged for deepfake detection and image attribution, as we show by reporting SOTA results on both the deepfake detection (Celeb-DF) and image attribution benchmarks. Vishal Asnani, Xi Yin 0001, Tal Hassner, Xiaoming Liu 0002 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2022 | Proactive Image Manipulation DetectionabstractImage manipulation detection algorithms are often trained to discriminate between images manipulated with particular Generative Models (GMs) and genuine/real images, yet generalize poorly to images manipulated with GMs unseen in the training. Conventional detection algorithms receive an input image passively. By contrast, we propose a proactive scheme to image manipulation detection. Our key enabling technique is to estimate a set of templates which when added onto the real image would lead to more accurate manipulation detection. That is, a template protected real image, and its manipulated version, is better discriminated compared to the original real image vs. its manipulated one. These templates are estimated using certain constraints based on the desired properties of templates. For image manipulation detection, our proposed approach outperforms the prior work by an average precision of 16%for CycleGAN and 32% for GauGAN. Our approach is generalizable to a variety of GMs showing an improvement over prior work by an average precision of 10% averaged across 12 GMs. Our code is available at https://www.github.com/vishal3477/proactive_IMD. Vishal Asnani, Xi Yin 0001, Tal Hassner, Sijia Liu 0001, Xiaoming Liu 0002 |
CVPR | 1 |