Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William G. Harris

dblp:297/2311 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 50% Human-AI interaction · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction › language-based interaction
command line interfaces
0.011983
Is there really trouble with UNIX? · CHI 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

error analysis · 0.0controlled experiment · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Is there really trouble with UNIX?
abstract
Donald Norman has claimed that UNIX has cryptic and inconsistent command names. As Michael Lesk has remarked, the lack of objective data makes it difficult to evaluate the significance of Norman's criticisms. In an effort to explore this controversy we taught one group of novice users the UNIX command language and another group an English-based command language (NUIX). The number of errors and calls for on-line assistance were compared. The subjects in this study were 22 high school women with no formal exposure to computers. The results reveal that the UNIX group made fewer errors than the NUIX group in two training sessions a week apart. Although calls for on-line assistance for the two groups in the first session were comparable, the UNIX group made over twice as many calls for on-line assistance in the second session as the NUIX group. Our findings suggest that even though the UNIX command language may not be harder for novice users to learn, it is probably more difficult for them to use.
Lorenzo De Leon, William G. Harris, Martha W. Evens
CHI2