Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yugesh Kothari

dblp:297/3239 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Concurrent programming · 60% Program verification · 23% Operating systems · 9%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Concurrent programming › synchronization
critical sections
0.712023
Ship your Critical Section, Not Your Data: Enabling Transparent Delegation with TCLOCKS · OSDI 2023
Concurrent programming
synchronization
0.712023
Ship your Critical Section, Not Your Data: Enabling Transparent Delegation with TCLOCKS · OSDI 2023
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.712023
Ship your Critical Section, Not Your Data: Enabling Transparent Delegation with TCLOCKS · OSDI 2023
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
delegation
0.212023
Ship your Critical Section, Not Your Data: Enabling Transparent Delegation with TCLOCKS · OSDI 2023
Operating systems › kernel
kernel design
0.212023
Ship your Critical Section, Not Your Data: Enabling Transparent Delegation with TCLOCKS · OSDI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification
0.112021
Automated Safety Verification of Programs Invoking Neural Networks · CAV (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synchronization · 1.3delegation · 1.3program analysis · 1.0neural network analysis · 1.0abstract interpretation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Ship your Critical Section, Not Your Data: Enabling Transparent Delegation with TCLOCKS
Vishal Gupta 0006, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Yugesh Kothari, Yueyang Pan, Diyu Zhou, Sanidhya Kashyap
OSDI3
2021 Automated Safety Verification of Programs Invoking Neural Networks
abstract
Abstract State-of-the-art program-analysis techniques are not yet able to effectively verify safety properties of heterogeneous systems, that is, systems with components implemented using diverse technologies. This shortcoming is pinpointed by programs invoking neural networks despite their acclaimed role as innovation drivers across many application areas. In this paper, we embark on the verification of system-level properties for systems characterized by interaction between programs and neural networks. Our technique provides a tight two-way integration of a program and a neural-network analysis and is formalized in a general framework based on abstract interpretation. We evaluate its effectiveness on 26 variants of a widely used, restricted autonomous-driving benchmark.
Maria Christakis, Hasan Ferit Eniser, Holger Hermanns, Jörg Hoffmann 0001, Yugesh Kothari, Jorge A. Navas, Valentin Wüstholz
CAV (1)5