Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franz Ostrizek

dblp:297/4879 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5503-1654ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › decision theory
information acquisition
0.812024
Acquisition, (Mis)use and Dissemination of Information: The Blessing of Cursedness and Transparency · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design
0.512021
Screening with Frames · EC 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › contract design
screening
0.512021
Screening with Frames · EC 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › dynamic mechanism design
dynamic incentive compatibility
0.112021
Screening with Frames · EC 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subjective envelope condition · 1.5cursed equilibrium · 1.5mechanism design · 0.5dynamic inconsistency · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Acquisition, (Mis)use and Dissemination of Information: The Blessing of Cursedness and Transparency
abstract
Adapting cursed equilibrium to a beauty contest game, we study the impact of information policies when agents underinfer from equilibrium statistics. To model information acquisition with incorrect use, we propose a subjective envelope condition: agents correctly anticipate their actions but incorrectly deem them optimal.
Franz Ostrizek, Elia Sartori
EC1
2021 Screening with Frames
abstract
We analyze screening with frame-dependent valuations. The optimal extensive form has a simple three-stage structure, using changes of framing (high-low-high) to induce dynamic inconsistency and thereby relax incentive compatibility constraints.
Franz Ostrizek, Denis Shishkin
EC1