Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marcin Gruza

dblp:297/8679 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-0058-9228ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Language models and text generation · 18%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.712023
PALS: Personalized Active Learning for Subjective Tasks in NLP · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › sentiment classification
cross-lingual sentiment classification
0.712023
Massively Multilingual Corpus of Sentiment Datasets and Multi-faceted Sentiment Classification Benchmark · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.712023
Massively Multilingual Corpus of Sentiment Datasets and Multi-faceted Sentiment Classification Benchmark · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › abusive language detection
aggression detection
0.512021
Controversy and Conformity: from Generalized to Personalized Aggressiveness Detection · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.512021
Controversy and Conformity: from Generalized to Personalized Aggressiveness Detection · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
personalization
0.512021
Controversy and Conformity: from Generalized to Personalized Aggressiveness Detection · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
personalized classifier
0.512021
Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing · ICDM 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
personalized representation learning
0.512021
Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing · ICDM 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification › semantic classification
subjective text classification
0.512021
Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing · ICDM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fine-tuning · 0.7active learning · 0.7personalization · 0.5multitask regression · 0.5deep learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 PALS: Personalized Active Learning for Subjective Tasks in NLP
abstract
Kamil Kanclerz, Konrad Karanowski, Julita Bielaniewicz, Marcin Gruza, Piotr Miłkowski, Jan Kocon, Przemyslaw Kazienko. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Kamil Kanclerz, Konrad Karanowski, Julita Bielaniewicz, Marcin Gruza, Piotr Milkowski, Jan Kocon, Przemyslaw Kazienko
EMNLP4
2023 Massively Multilingual Corpus of Sentiment Datasets and Multi-faceted Sentiment Classification Benchmark
abstract
Despite impressive advancements in multilingual corpora collection and model training, developing large-scale deployments of multilingual models still presents a significant challenge. This is particularly true for language tasks that are culture-dependent. One such example is the area of multilingual sentiment analysis, where affective markers can be subtle and deeply ensconced in culture.This work presents the most extensive open massively multilingual corpus of datasets for training sentiment models. The corpus consists of 79 manually selected datasets from over 350 datasets reported in the scientific literature based on strict quality criteria. The corpus covers 27 languages representing 6 language families. Datasets can be queried using several linguistic and functional features. In addition, we present a multi-faceted sentiment classification benchmark summarizing hundreds of experiments conducted on different base models, training objectives, dataset collections, and fine-tuning strategies.
Lukasz Augustyniak, Szymon Wozniak, Marcin Gruza, Piotr Gramacki, Krzysztof Rajda, Mikolaj Morzy, Tomasz Kajdanowicz
NeurIPS3
2022 Multi-model Analysis of Language-Agnostic Sentiment Classification on MultiEmo Data
Piotr Milkowski, Marcin Gruza, Przemyslaw Kazienko, Joanna Szolomicka, Stanislaw Wozniak, Jan Kocon
ICCCI2
2021 Controversy and Conformity: from Generalized to Personalized Aggressiveness Detection
abstract
Kamil Kanclerz, Alicja Figas, Marcin Gruza, Tomasz Kajdanowicz, Jan Kocon, Daria Puchalska, Przemyslaw Kazienko. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Kamil Kanclerz, Alicja Figas, Marcin Gruza, Tomasz Kajdanowicz, Jan Kocon, Daria Puchalska, Przemyslaw Kazienko
ACL/IJCNLP (1)3
2021 Learning Personal Human Biases and Representations for Subjective Tasks in Natural Language Processing
abstract
Many tasks in natural language processing like offensive, toxic, or emotional text classification are subjective by nature. Humans tend to perceive textual content in their own individual way. Existing methods commonly rely on the agreed output values, the same for all consumers. Here, we propose personalized solutions to subjective tasks. Our four new deep learning models take into account not only the content but also the specificity of a given human. The models represent different approaches to learning the representation and processing data about text readers. The experiments were carried out on four datasets: Wikipedia discussion texts labelled with attack, aggression, and toxicity, as well as opinions annotated with ten numerical emotional categories. Emotional data was considered as multivariate regression (multitask), whereas Wikipedia data as independent classifications. All our models based on human biases and their representations significantly improve the prediction quality in subjective tasks evaluated from the individual’s perspective.
Jan Kocon, Marcin Gruza, Julita Bielaniewicz, Damian Grimling, Kamil Kanclerz, Piotr Milkowski, Przemyslaw Kazienko
ICDM2
2021 Offensive, aggressive, and hate speech analysis: From data-centric to human-centered approach
abstract
Analysis of subjective texts like offensive content or hate speech is a great challenge, especially regarding annotation process. Most of current annotation procedures are aimed at achieving a high level of agreement in order to generate a high quality reference source. However, the annotation guidelines for subjective content may restrict the annotators’ freedom of decision making . Motivated by a moderate annotation agreement in offensive content datasets, we hypothesize that personalized approaches to offensive content identification should be in place. Thus, we propose two novel perspectives of perception: group-based and individual. Using demographics of annotators as well as embeddings of their previous decisions (annotated texts), we are able to train multimodal models (including transformer-based) adjusted to personal or community profiles. Based on the agreement of individuals and groups, we experimentally showed that annotator group agreeability strongly correlates with offensive content recognition quality. The proposed personalized approaches enabled us to create models adaptable to personal user beliefs rather than to agreed offensiveness understanding. Overall, our individualized approaches to offensive content classification outperform classic data-centric methods that generalize offensiveness perception and it refers to all six tested models. Additionally, we developed requirements for annotation procedures, personalization and content processing to make the solutions human-centered.
Jan Kocon, Alicja Figas, Marcin Gruza, Daria Puchalska, Tomasz Kajdanowicz, Przemyslaw Kazienko
Inf. Process. Manag.3