Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nandeeka Nayak
dblp:298/8576
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-8895-8206ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Electronic design automation · 46% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 40% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 9% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | RTeAAL Sim: Using Tensor Algebra to Represent and Accelerate RTL Simulation · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
RTL simulation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | RTeAAL Sim: Using Tensor Algebra to Represent and Accelerate RTL Simulation · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Electronic design automation › design automation tools › accelerator design automation
accelerator design space exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TeAAL: A Declarative Framework for Modeling Sparse Tensor Accelerators · MICRO 2023 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › accelerator architecture
accelerator modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TeAAL: A Declarative Framework for Modeling Sparse Tensor Accelerators · MICRO 2023 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › sparsity exploitation
sparse tensor accelerator |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TeAAL: A Declarative Framework for Modeling Sparse Tensor Accelerators · MICRO 2023 |
Hardware security and side channels
microarchitectural side channel |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Opening Pandora's Box: A Systematic Study of New Ways Microarchitecture Can Leak Private Data · ISCA 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | RTeAAL Sim: Using Tensor Algebra to Represent and Accelerate RTL Simulation · ASPLOS (2) 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FuseMax: Leveraging Extended Einsums to Optimize Attention Accelerator Design · MICRO 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FuseMax: Leveraging Extended Einsums to Optimize Attention Accelerator Design · MICRO 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
spatial architecture |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | TeAAL: A Declarative Framework for Modeling Sparse Tensor Accelerators · MICRO 2023 |
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks › transient execution attack
speculative execution attack |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Opening Pandora's Box: A Systematic Study of New Ways Microarchitecture Can Leak Private Data · ISCA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
einsum cascade · 1.5tensor representation · 1.0sparse tensor algebra · 1.0proof-of-concept implementation · 1.0literature analysis · 1.0declarative modeling · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | RTeAAL Sim: Using Tensor Algebra to Represent and Accelerate RTL SimulationabstractRTL simulation on CPUs remains a persistent bottleneck in hardware design. State-of-the-art simulators embed the circuit directly into the simulation binary, resulting in long compilation times and execution that is fundamentally CPU frontend-bound, with severe instruction-cache pressure. This work proposes RTeAAL Sim, which reformulates RTL simulation as a sparse tensor algebra problem. By representing RTL circuits as tensors and simulation as a sparse tensor algebra kernel, RTeAAL Sim decouples simulation behavior from binary size and makes RTL simulation amenable to well-studied tensor algebra optimizations. We demonstrate that a prototype of our tensor-based simulator, even with a subset of these optimizations, already mitigates the compilation overhead and frontend pressure and achieves performance competitive with the highly optimized Verilator simulator across multiple CPUs and ISAs. Boru Chen, Christopher W. Fletcher, Nandeeka Nayak |
ASPLOS (2) | 4 |
| 2024 | FuseMax: Leveraging Extended Einsums to Optimize Attention Accelerator DesignabstractAttention for transformers is a critical workload that has recently received significant ‘attention’ as a target for custom acceleration. Yet, while prior work succeeds in reducing attention's memory-bandwidth requirements, it creates load imbalance between operators that comprise the attention computation (resulting in severe compute under-utilization) and requires on-chip memory that scales with sequence length (which is expected to grow over time). This paper ameliorates these issues, enabling attention with nearly 100% compute utilization, no off-chip memory traffic bottlenecks, and on-chip buffer size requirements that are independent of sequence length. The main conceptual contribution is to use a recently proposed abstraction―the cascade of Einsums― to describe, formalize, and taxonomize the space of attention algorithms that appear in the literature. In particular, we show how Einsum cascades can be used to infer non-trivial lower bounds on the number of passes a kernel must take through its input data, which has implications for either required on-chip buffer capacity or memory traffic. We show how this notion can be used to meaningfully divide the space of attention algorithms into several categories and use these categories to inform our design process. Based on the above characterization, we propose FuseMax―a novel mapping and binding of attention onto a spatial array-style architecture. On attention, in an iso-area comparison, FuseMax achieves an average 6.7 x speedup over the prior state-of-the-art, FLAT, while using 79% of the energy. Similarly, on full end-to-end transformer inference, FuseMax achieves an average 5.3 x speedup over FLAT using 83% of the energy. Nandeeka Nayak, Xinrui Wu, Toluwanimi O. Odemuyiwa, Michael Pellauer, Joel S. Emer, Christopher W. Fletcher |
MICRO | 1 |
| 2023 | TeAAL: A Declarative Framework for Modeling Sparse Tensor AcceleratorsabstractOver the past few years, the explosion in sparse tensor algebra workloads has led to a corresponding rise in domain-specific accelerators to service them. Due to the irregularity present in sparse tensors, these accelerators employ a wide variety of novel solutions to achieve good performance. At the same time, prior work on design-flexible sparse accelerator modeling does not express this full range of design features, making it difficult to understand the impact of each design choice and compare or extend the state-of-the-art. Nandeeka Nayak, Toluwanimi O. Odemuyiwa, Shubham Ugare, Christopher W. Fletcher, Michael Pellauer, Joel S. Emer |
MICRO | 1 |
| 2021 | Opening Pandora's Box: A Systematic Study of New Ways Microarchitecture Can Leak Private DataabstractMicroarchitectural attacks have plunged Computer Architecture into a security crisis. Yet, as the slowing of Moore’s law justifies the use of ever more exotic microarchitecture, it is likely we have only seen the tip of the iceberg.To better anticipate this security crisis, this paper performs a systematic security-centric analysis of the Computer Architecture literature. Our rationale is that when implementing current and future processors, microarchitects will (quite reasonably) look to previously-proposed ideas. Our study uncovers seven classes of microarchitectural optimization with novel security implications, proposes a conceptual framework through which to study them and demonstrates several proofs-of-concept to show their efficacy. The optimizations we study range from those that leak as much privacy as Spectre/Meltdown (but without exploiting speculative execution) to those that otherwise undermine security-critical programs in a variety of ways. Many have storied histories— ranging from industry patents to media/3rd party speculation regarding current implementation status to recent renewed interest in the academic community. This paper’s goal is to perform an early (hopefully not too late) analysis to inform their development moving forward. Jose Rodrigo Sanchez Vicarte, Pradyumna Shome, Nandeeka Nayak, Caroline Trippel, Adam Morrison 0001, David Kohlbrenner, Christopher W. Fletcher |
ISCA | 3 |