Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Subhajit Sahu
dblp:299/1351
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5140-6578ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 6 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 93% Algorithms and data structures · 7% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 56% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 44% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | νMG-LPA and νBM-LPA: Memory Efficient GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithms (LPA) for Community Detection · HPDC 2026 Efficient Tracking of Communities on Evolving Graphs with Leiden Algorithm · HPDC 2026 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Tracking of Communities on Evolving Graphs with Leiden Algorithm · HPDC 2026 |
Parallel and multicore computing › graph processing
community detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | νMG-LPA and νBM-LPA: Memory Efficient GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithms (LPA) for Community Detection · HPDC 2026 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU graph processing
GPU graph algorithms |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | νMG-LPA and νBM-LPA: Memory Efficient GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithms (LPA) for Community Detection · HPDC 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network diffusion
label propagation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | νMG-LPA and νBM-LPA: Memory Efficient GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithms (LPA) for Community Detection · HPDC 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
temporal graph |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Tracking of Communities on Evolving Graphs with Leiden Algorithm · HPDC 2026 |
Algorithms and data structures › dynamic algorithms
dynamic graph algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Efficient Tracking of Communities on Evolving Graphs with Leiden Algorithm · HPDC 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
misra-gries sketch · 2.0leiden algorithm · 2.0label propagation · 2.0boyer-moore sketch · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Efficient Tracking of Communities on Evolving Graphs with Leiden Algorithm
Subhajit Sahu |
HPDC | 1 |
| 2026 | νMG-LPA and νBM-LPA: Memory Efficient GPU-based Label Propagation Algorithms (LPA) for Community DetectionabstractCommunity detection involves grouping nodes in a graph with dense connections within groups, than between them. Recently, efficient multicore (GVE-LPA) and GPU-based (ν -LPA) implementations of Label Propagation Algorithm (LPA) for community detection have been proposed. However, these methods incur high memory overhead due to their per-thread/per-vertex hashtables. This makes it challenging to process large graphs on shared memory systems. In this paper, we introduce memory-efficient GPU-based LPA, using weighted Boyer-Moore (BM) and Misra-Gries (MG) sketches. Our ν MG8-LPA, using an 8-slot MG sketch, reduces memory usage by 98 × and 44 × compared to GVE-LPA and ν -LPA, respectively. It is also 2.4 × faster than GVE-LPA and only 1.1 × slower than ν -LPA, with minimal quality loss (below \(5\%\) on average). Subhajit Sahu |
HPDC | 1 |
| 2026 | GVE-LPA and GSL-LPA: High-speed and internally-connected label propagation on multicore systems
Subhajit Sahu, Kishore Kothapalli, Dip Sankar Banerjee |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 2025 | A Fast Parallel Approach for Neighborhood-Based Link Prediction by Disregarding Large HubsabstractABSTRACT Link prediction can help rectify inaccuracies in various graph algorithms, stemming from unaccounted‐for or overlooked links within networks. However, many existing works use a baseline approach, which incurs unnecessary computational costs due to its high time complexity. Further, many studies focus on smaller graphs, which can lead to misleading conclusions. Here, we study the prediction of links using neighborhood‐based similarity measures on large graphs. In particular, we improve upon the baseline approach (IBase), and propose a heuristic approach that additionally disregards large hubs (DLH), based on the idea that high‐degree nodes contribute little similarity among their neighbors. On a server equipped with dual 16‐core Intel Xeon Gold 6226R processors, DLH is on average faster than IBase, especially on web graphs and social networks, while maintaining similar prediction accuracy. Notably, DLH achieves a link prediction rate of 38.1M edges/s and improves performance by for every doubling of threads. Subhajit Sahu, Kishore Kothapalli |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 2024 | DF* PageRank: Incrementally Expanding Approaches for Updating PageRank on Dynamic Graphs
Subhajit Sahu, Kishore Kothapalli, Hemalatha Eedi, Sathya Peri |
Euro-Par (3) | 1 |
| 2024 | Fast Leiden Algorithm for Community Detection in Shared Memory SettingabstractCommunity detection is the problem of identifying natural divisions in networks. Efficient parallel algorithms for identifying such divisions is critical in a number of applications, where the size of datasets have reached significant scales. This paper presents one of the most efficient implementations of the Leiden algorithm, a high quality community detection method. On a server equipped with dual 16-core Intel Xeon Gold 6226R processors, our Leiden implementation, which we term as GVE-Leiden, outperforms NetworKit Leiden and cuGraph Leiden (running on NVIDIA A100 GPU) by 8.2 × and 3.0 × respectively — achieving a processing rate of 403M edges/s on a 3.8B edge graph. In addition, GVE-Leiden improves performance at a rate of 1.6 × for every doubling of threads. Subhajit Sahu, Kishore Kothapalli, Dip Sankar Banerjee |
ICPP | 1 |