In this paper, we investigate the optimal online configuration of episodic Markov decision processes when the space of the possible configurations is continuous. Specifically, we study the interaction between a learner (referred to as the configurator) and an agent with a fixed, unknown policy, when the learner aims to minimize her losses by choosing transition functions in online fashion. The losses may be unrelated to the agent's rewards. This problem applies to many real-world scenarios where the learner seeks to manipulate the Markov decision process to her advantage. We study both deterministic and stochastic settings, where the losses are either fixed or sampled from an unknown probability distribution. We design two algorithms whose peculiarity is to rely on occupancy measures to explore with optimism the continuous space of transition functions, achieving constant regret in deterministic settings and sublinear regret in stochastic settings, respectively. Moreover, we prove that the regret bound is tight with respect to any constant factor in deterministic settings. Finally, we compare the empiric performance of our algorithms with a baseline in synthetic experiments.

In adversarial team games, a team of players sequentially faces a team of adversaries. These games are the simplest setting with multiple players where cooperation and competition coexist, and it is known that the information asymmetry among the team members makes equilibrium approximation computationally hard. Although much effort has been spent designing scalable algorithms, the problem of solving large game instances is open. In this paper, we extend the successful approach of solving huge two-player zero-sum games, where a blueprint strategy is computed offline by using an abstract version of the game and then it is refined online, that is, during a playthrough. In particular, to the best of our knowledge, our paper provides the first method for online strategy refinement via subgame solving in adversarial team games. Our method, based on the team belief DAG, generates a gadget game and then refine the blueprint strategy by using column-generation approaches in anytime fashion. If the blueprint is sparse, then our whole algorithm runs end-to-end in polynomial time given a best-response oracle; in particular, it avoids expanding the whole team belief DAG, which has exponential worst-case size. We apply our method to a standard test suite, and we empirically show the performance improvement of the strategies thanks to subgame solving.