Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chloe Wohlgemuth

dblp:299/5005 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2353-3646ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Approximation and online algorithms · 25% Computational complexity · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › centrality › betweenness centrality
approximate betweenness centrality
0.512021
Bavarian: Betweenness Centrality Approximation with Variance-Aware Rademacher Averages · KDD 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.512021
Bavarian: Betweenness Centrality Approximation with Variance-Aware Rademacher Averages · KDD 2021
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.512021
Bavarian: Betweenness Centrality Approximation with Variance-Aware Rademacher Averages · KDD 2021
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › randomized approximation
sampling-based approximation
0.512021
Bavarian: Betweenness Centrality Approximation with Variance-Aware Rademacher Averages · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance-aware tail bounds · 0.5progressive sampling · 0.5monte-carlo empirical rademacher averages · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Bavarian: Betweenness Centrality Approximation with Variance-aware Rademacher Averages
abstract
“[A]llain Gersten, Hopfen, und Wasser”— 1516 Reinheitsgebot We presentBavarian, a collection of sampling-based algorithms for approximating the Betweenness Centrality (BC) of all vertices in a graph. Our algorithms use Monte-Carlo Empirical Rademacher Averages (MCERAs), a concept from statistical learning theory, to efficiently compute tight bounds on the maximum deviation of the estimates from the exact values. The MCERAs provide a sample-dependent approximation guarantee much stronger than the state-of-the-art, thanks to its use of variance-aware probabilistic tail bounds. The flexibility of the MCERAs allows us to introduce a unifying framework that can be instantiated with existing sampling-based estimators of BC, thus allowing a fair comparison between them, decoupled from the sample-complexity results with which they were originally introduced. Additionally, we prove novel sample-complexity results showing that, for all estimators, the sample size sufficient to achieve a desired approximation guarantee depends on the vertex-diameter of the graph, an easy-to-bound characteristic quantity. We also show progressive-sampling algorithms and extensions to other centrality measures, such as percolation centrality. Our extensive experimental evaluation ofBavarianshows the improvement over the state-of-the-art made possible by the MCERAs (2–4× reduction in the error bound), and it allows us to assess the different trade-offs between sample size and accuracy guarantees offered by the different estimators.
Cyrus Cousins, Chloe Wohlgemuth, Matteo Riondato
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data2
2021 Bavarian: Betweenness Centrality Approximation with Variance-Aware Rademacher Averages
abstract
We present Bavarian, a collection of sampling-based algorithms for approximating the Betweenness Centrality (BC) of all vertices in a graph. Our algorithms use Monte-Carlo Empirical Rademacher Averages (MCERAs), a concept from statistical learning theory, to efficiently compute tight bounds on the maximum deviation of the estimates from the exact values. The MCERAs provide a sample-dependent approximation guarantee much stronger than the state of the art, thanks to its use of variance-aware probabilistic tail bounds. The flexibility of the MCERA allows us to introduce a unifying framework that can be instantiated with existing sampling-based estimators of BC, thus allowing a fair comparison between them, decoupled from the sample-complexity results with which they were originally introduced. Additionally, we prove novel sample-complexity results showing that, for all estimators, the sample size sufficient to achieve a desired approximation guarantee depends on the vertex-diameter of the graph, an easy-to-bound characteristic quantity. We also show progressive-sampling algorithms and extensions to other centrality measures, such as percolation centrality. Our extensive experimental evaluation of Bavarian shows the improvement over the state-of-the art made possible by the MCERA, and it allows us to assess the different trade-offs between sample size and accuracy guarantee offered by the different estimators.
Cyrus Cousins, Chloe Wohlgemuth, Matteo Riondato
KDD2