Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Francesco Saina

dblp:299/7044 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0008-4779-3294ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Machine translation · 62% Information extraction and text analysis · 38%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.212022
DiBiMT: A Novel Benchmark for Measuring Word Sense Disambiguation Biases in Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word sense disambiguation
polysemy
0.212022
DiBiMT: A Novel Benchmark for Measuring Word Sense Disambiguation Biases in Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.6linguistic analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 DiBiMT: A Novel Benchmark for Measuring Word Sense Disambiguation Biases in Machine Translation
abstract
Lexical ambiguity poses one of the greatest challenges in the field of Machine Translation.Over the last few decades, multiple efforts have been undertaken to investigate incorrect translations caused by the polysemous nature of words.Within this body of research, some studies have posited that models pick up semantic biases existing in the training data, thus producing translation errors.In this paper, we present DIBIMT, the first entirely manuallycurated evaluation benchmark which enables an extensive study of semantic biases in Machine Translation of nominal and verbal words in five different language combinations, namely, English and one or other of the following languages: Chinese, German, Italian, Russian and Spanish.Furthermore, we test state-of-the-art Machine Translation systems, both commercial and non-commercial ones, against our new test bed and provide a thorough statistical and linguistic analysis of the results.We release DIBIMT at https:// nlp.uniroma1.it/dibimtas a closed benchmark with a public leaderboard.
Niccolò Campolungo, Federico Martelli, Francesco Saina, Roberto Navigli
ACL (1)3