Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Juspreet Singh Sandhu

dblp:299/8207 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8598-5096ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 36% Algorithms and data structures · 28% Approximation and online algorithms · 18%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods
0.912025
Potential Hessian Ascent: The Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model · SODA 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.612022
Limitations of Local Quantum Algorithms on Random MAX-k-XOR and Beyond · ICALP 2022
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.612022
Limitations of Local Quantum Algorithms on Random MAX-k-XOR and Beyond · ICALP 2022
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
0.612022
Limitations of Local Quantum Algorithms on Random MAX-k-XOR and Beyond · ICALP 2022
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum approximate optimization algorithm
0.612022
Limitations of Local Quantum Algorithms on Random MAX-k-XOR and Beyond · ICALP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative spectral algorithm · 1.7hessian ascent · 1.7statistical physics · 0.6coupled overlap-gap property · 0.6concentration inequalities · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Potential Hessian Ascent: The Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model
abstract
We present the first iterative spectral algorithm to find near-optimal solutions for a random quadratic objective over the discrete hypercube, resolving a conjecture of Subag [Sub21].
David Jekel, Juspreet Singh Sandhu, Jonathan Shi
SODA2
2023 Random Max-CSPs Inherit Algorithmic Hardness from Spin Glasses
abstract
We study random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) in the unsatisfiable regime. We relate the structure of near-optimal solutions for any Max-CSP to that for an associated spin glass on the hypercube, using the Guerra-Toninelli interpolation from statistical physics. The noise stability polynomial of the CSP's predicate is, up to a constant, the mixture polynomial of the associated spin glass. We prove two main consequences: 1) We relate the maximum fraction of constraints that can be satisfied in a random Max-CSP to the ground state energy density of the corresponding spin glass. Since the latter value can be computed with the Parisi formula, we provide numerical values for some popular CSPs. 2) We prove that a Max-CSP possesses generalized versions of the overlap gap property if and only if the same holds for the corresponding spin glass. We transfer results from Huang et al. [arXiv:2110.07847, 2021] to obstruct algorithms with overlap concentration on a large class of Max-CSPs. This immediately includes local classical and local quantum algorithms.
Kunal Marwaha, Juspreet Singh Sandhu, Jonathan Shi
ITCS3
2022 Limitations of Local Quantum Algorithms on Random MAX-k-XOR and Beyond
abstract
We introduce a notion of \emph{generic local algorithm} which strictly generalizes existing frameworks of local algorithms such as \emph{factors of i.i.d.} by capturing local \emph{quantum} algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). Motivated by a question of Farhi et al. [arXiv:1910.08187, 2019] we then show limitations of generic local algorithms including QAOA on random instances of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). Specifically, we show that any generic local algorithm whose assignment to a vertex depends only on a local neighborhood with $o(n)$ other vertices (such as the QAOA at depth less than $ε\log(n)$) cannot arbitrarily-well approximate boolean CSPs if the problem satisfies a geometric property from statistical physics called the coupled overlap-gap property (OGP) [Chen et al., Annals of Probability, 47(3), 2019]. We show that the random MAX-k-XOR problem has this property when $k\geq4$ is even by extending the corresponding result for diluted $k$-spin glasses. Our concentration lemmas confirm a conjecture of Brandao et al. [arXiv:1812.04170, 2018] asserting that the landscape independence of QAOA extends to logarithmic depth -- in other words, for every fixed choice of QAOA angle parameters, the algorithm at logarithmic depth performs almost equally well on almost all instances. One of these concentration lemmas is a strengthening of McDiarmid's inequality, applicable when the random variables have a highly biased distribution, and may be of independent interest.
Chi-Ning Chou, Peter J. Love, Juspreet Singh Sandhu, Jonathan Shi
ICALP3