Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Egils Stalidzans

dblp:30/11002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-6063-0184ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › global optimization
stochastic global optimization
0.112017
SpaceScanner: COPASI wrapper for automated management of global stochastic optimization experiments · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel optimization runs · 0.6consensus-based termination · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Community effort endorsing multiscale modelling, multiscale data science and multiscale computing for systems medicine
abstract
Systems medicine holds many promises, but has so far provided only a limited number of proofs of principle. To address this road block, possible barriers and challenges of translating systems medicine into clinical practice need to be identified and addressed. The members of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action CA15120 Open Multiscale Systems Medicine (OpenMultiMed) wish to engage the scientific community of systems medicine and multiscale modelling, data science and computing, to provide their feedback in a structured manner. This will result in follow-up white papers and open access resources to accelerate the clinical translation of systems medicine.
Massimiliano Zanin, Ivan Chorbev, Blaz Stres, Egils Stalidzans, Julio Vera, Paolo Tieri, Filippo Castiglione, Derek Groen, Huiru Zheng, Jan Baumbach, Johannes A. Schmid, José Basilio, Peter Klimek, Natasa Debeljak, Damjana Rozman, Harald H. H. W. Schmidt
Briefings Bioinform.4
2017 SpaceScanner: COPASI wrapper for automated management of global stochastic optimization experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Due to their universal applicability, global stochastic optimization methods are popular for designing improvements of biochemical networks. The drawbacks of global stochastic optimization methods are: (i) no guarantee of finding global optima, (ii) no clear optimization run termination criteria and (iii) no criteria to detect stagnation of an optimization run. The impact of these drawbacks can be partly compensated by manual work that becomes inefficient when the solution space is large due to combinatorial explosion of adjustable parameters or for other reasons. RESULTS: SpaceScanner uses parallel optimization runs for automatic termination of optimization tasks in case of consensus and consecutively applies a pre-defined set of global stochastic optimization methods in case of stagnation in the currently used method. Automatic scan of adjustable parameter combination subsets for best objective function values is possible with a summary file of ranked solutions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/atiselsts/spacescanner . CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Atis Elsts, Agris Pentjuss, Egils Stalidzans
Bioinform.3
2017 Search for a Minimal Set of Parameters by Assessing the Total Optimization Potential for a Dynamic Model of a Biochemical Network
abstract
Selecting an efficient small set of adjustable parameters to improve metabolic features of an organism is important for a reduction of implementation costs and risks of unpredicted side effects. In practice, to avoid the analysis of a huge combinatorial space for the possible sets of adjustable parameters, experience-, and intuition-based subsets of parameters are often chosen, possibly leaving some interesting counter-intuitive combinations of parameters unrevealed. The combinatorial scan of possible adjustable parameter combinations at the model optimization level is possible; however, the number of analyzed combinations is still limited. The total optimization potential (TOP) approach is proposed to assess the full potential for increasing the value of the objective function by optimizing all possible adjustable parameters. This seemingly unpractical combination of adjustable parameters allows assessing the maximum attainable value of the objective function and stopping the combinatorial space scanning when the desired fraction of TOP is reached and any further increase in the number of adjustable parameters cannot bring any reasonable improvement. The relation between the number of adjustable parameters and the reachable fraction of TOP is a valuable guideline in choosing a rational solution for industrial implementation. The TOP approach is demonstrated on the basis of two case studies.
Egils Stalidzans, Ivars Mozga, Jurijs Sulins, Peteris Zikmanis
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.1