Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Näf

dblp:30/2095 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.212013
Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing › team collaboration
cross-cultural collaboration
0.212013
Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing › groupware
event scheduling
0.212013
Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing › cooperative work
group decision-making
0.212013
Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making · CSCW 2013
Computational social science and digital humanities › cultural analysis
cultural differences
0.012013
Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making · CSCW 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large-scale log analysis · 0.3correlation analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Doodle around the world: online scheduling behavior reflects cultural differences in time perception and group decision-making
abstract
Event scheduling is a group decision-making process in which social dynamics influence people's choices and the overall outcome. As a result, scheduling is not simply a matter of finding a mutually agreeable time, but a process that is shaped by social norms and values, which can highly vary between countries. To investigate the influence of national culture on people's scheduling behavior we analyzed more than 1.5 million Doodle date/time polls from 211 countries. We found strong correlations between characteristics of national culture and several behavioral phenomena, such as that poll participants from collectivist countries respond earlier, agree to fewer options but find more consensus than predominantly individualist societies. Our study provides empirical evidence of behavioral differences in group decision-making and time perception with implications for cross-cultural collaborative work.
Katharina Reinecke, Minh Khoa Nguyen, Abraham Bernstein, Michael Näf, Krzysztof Z. Gajos
CSCW4