Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Eaton
dblp:30/2113
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 87% Design research and methods · 13% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004 |
Human-robot interaction › wearable robot
exoskeleton |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004 |
Human-robot interaction
wearable robot |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004 |
Design research and methods › design process
nature-inspired design |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feasibility analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming ExoskeletonsabstractWe present several biologically inspired concept designs and feasibility analyses for underwater swimming exoskeletons. These designs are biologically inspired, based on observations of dolphins, sea turtles, and penguins. Biologically inspired designs have the advantages of stealth, maneuverability, and a natural interface when compared to propeller driven underwater propulsion devices. We present a lower body concept, based on dolphin locomotion and an upper body concept based on sea turtle and penguin locomotion. The dolphin based concept has the advantages of using the wearer's most powerful muscle groups, of being the most natural to swim with, and of leaving the user's hands free for other tasks. The sea-turtle based concept has the advantage of novelty and may have appeal as a recreational device. We predict that with actuation and energy storage components available today, an exoskeleton that produces a cruising speed of over 1 m/s and a top speed of over 1.5 m/s is feasible. We estimate that cruising at 1 m/s can be achieved with less than 504 Watts power consumption, which translates into 2.4 kg of off-the-shelf silver-zinc batteries per hour of operation. Peter D. Neuhaus, David Eaton, John Carff, Jerry E. Pratt |
ICRA | 3 |