Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Eaton

dblp:30/2113 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 87% Design research and methods · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.012004
Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics
0.012004
Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004
Human-robot interaction › wearable robot
exoskeleton
0.012004
Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004
Human-robot interaction
wearable robot
0.012004
Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004
Design research and methods › design process
nature-inspired design
0.012004
Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons · ICRA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feasibility analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Concept Designs for Underwater Swimming Exoskeletons
abstract
We present several biologically inspired concept designs and feasibility analyses for underwater swimming exoskeletons. These designs are biologically inspired, based on observations of dolphins, sea turtles, and penguins. Biologically inspired designs have the advantages of stealth, maneuverability, and a natural interface when compared to propeller driven underwater propulsion devices. We present a lower body concept, based on dolphin locomotion and an upper body concept based on sea turtle and penguin locomotion. The dolphin based concept has the advantages of using the wearer's most powerful muscle groups, of being the most natural to swim with, and of leaving the user's hands free for other tasks. The sea-turtle based concept has the advantage of novelty and may have appeal as a recreational device. We predict that with actuation and energy storage components available today, an exoskeleton that produces a cruising speed of over 1 m/s and a top speed of over 1.5 m/s is feasible. We estimate that cruising at 1 m/s can be achieved with less than 504 Watts power consumption, which translates into 2.4 kg of off-the-shelf silver-zinc batteries per hour of operation.
Peter D. Neuhaus, David Eaton, John Carff, Jerry E. Pratt
ICRA3