Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bauke Freiburg

dblp:30/2804 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video retrieval
0.112011
Crowdsourcing visual detectors for video search · ACM Multimedia 2011
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing
0.112011
Crowdsourcing visual detectors for video search · ACM Multimedia 2011
Collaborative and social computing › social computing
social tagging
0.112011
Crowdsourcing visual detectors for video search · ACM Multimedia 2011
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video retrieval
video search engine
0.112010
Crowdsourcing rock n' roll multimedia retrieval · ACM Multimedia 2010
Information retrieval
ranking
0.012011
Crowdsourcing visual detectors for video search · ACM Multimedia 2011
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia analysis › multimedia content description › multimedia semantics
semantic concept detection
0.012010
Crowdsourcing rock n' roll multimedia retrieval · ACM Multimedia 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowd agreement aggregation · 0.4automated content understanding · 0.4crowdsourcing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 SocialZap: Catch-up on Interesting Television Fragments Discovered from Social Media
abstract
In this paper we present SocialZap, a multimedia search engine that finds the most interesting fragments, zap points, in a television broadcast based on microblog posts and socially tagged photos. The main novelty of SocialZap is the fully-automatic transfer of the learned viewers interest from textual posts to the visual channel, without the need for any manual effort in the process. Once SocialZap finds the zap points, users can easily browse through a television broadcast and directly watch the interesting fragments. Thus, SocialZap adds social experience to watching television.
Svetlana Kordumova, Christoph Kofler, Dennis C. Koelma, Bouke Huurnink, Bauke Freiburg, Joris Kleinveld, Manuel van Rijn, Marco van Deursen, Martha A. Larson, Cees Snoek
ICMR5
2011 Crowdsourcing visual detectors for video search
abstract
In this paper, we study social tagging at the video fragment-level using a combination of automated content understanding and the wisdom of the crowds. We are interested in the question whether crowdsourcing can be beneficial to a video search engine that automatically recognizes video fragments on a semantic level. To answer this question, we perform a 3-month online field study with a concert video search engine targeted at a dedicated user-community of pop concert enthusiasts. We harvest the feedback of more than 500 active users and perform two experiments. In experiment 1 we measure user incentive to provide feedback, in experiment 2 we determine the tradeoff between feedback quality and quantity when aggregated over multiple users. Results show that users provide sufficient feedback, which becomes highly reliable when a crowd agreement of 67% is enforced.
Bauke Freiburg, Jaap Kamps, Cees Snoek
ACM Multimedia1
2010 Crowdsourcing rock n' roll multimedia retrieval
abstract
In this technical demonstration, we showcase a multimedia search engine that facilitates semantic access to archival rock n' roll concert video. The key novelty is the crowdsourcing mechanism, which relies on online users to improve, extend, and share, automatically detected results in video fragments using an advanced timeline-based video player. The user-feedback serves as valuable input to further improve automated multimedia retrieval results, such as automatically detected concepts and automatically transcribed interviews. The search engine has been operational online to harvest valuable feedback from rock n' roll enthusiasts.
Cees Snoek, Bauke Freiburg, Johan Oomen, Roeland Ordelman
ACM Multimedia2
2007 The Role of Visual Content and Style for Concert Video Indexing
abstract
This paper contributes to the automatic indexing of concert video. In contrast to traditional methods, which rely primarily on audio information for summarization applications, we explore how a visual-only concept detection approach could be employed. We investigate how our recent method for news video indexing -which takes into account the role of content and style -generalizes to the concert domain. We analyze concert video on three levels of visual abstraction, namely: content, style, and their fusion. Experiments with 12 concept detectors, on 45 hours of visually challenging concert video, show that the automatically learned best approach is concept-dependent. Moreover, these results suggest that the visual modality provides ample opportunity for more effective indexing and retrieval of concert video when used in addition to the auditory modality.
Cees Snoek, Marcel Worring, Arnold W. M. Smeulders, Bauke Freiburg
ICME4
2005 The Multimedian Concert-Video Browser
abstract
The MultimediaN concert-video browser demonstrates a video interaction environment for efficiently browsing video registrations of pop, rock and other music concerts. The exhibition displays the current state of the project for developing an advanced concert-video browser in 2007. Three demos are provided: 1) a high-level content analysis methodology for modeling the "experience" of the concert at its different stages, and for automatically detecting and identifying semantically coherent temporal segments in concert videos, 2) a general-purpose video editor that associates semantic descriptions with the video segments using both manual and automatic inputs, and a video browser that applies ideas from information foraging theory and demonstrates patch-based video browsing, 3) the Fabplayer, specifically designed for patch-based browsing of concert videos by a dedicated user-group, making use of the results of automatic concert-video segmentation
Ynze van Houten, Suphi Umut Naci, Bauke Freiburg, Robbert Eggermont, Sander Schuurman, Danny Hollander, Jaap Reitsma, Maurice Markslag, Justin Kniest, Mattina Veenstra, Alan Hanjalic
ICME3