Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gareth J. Edwards

dblp:30/4199 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 9 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 13 · 8 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Face, body and person analysis · 75% 3D vision · 13% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 6%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 84% Geometric modeling and processing · 16%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
0.141999
Improving Identification Performance by Integrating Evidence from Sequences · CVPR 1999
Simultaneous Extraction of Functional Face Subspaces · CVPR 1999
Learning to Identify and Track Faces in Image Sequences · ICCV 1998
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face modeling
active appearance model
0.131999
Advances in Active Appearance Models · ICCV 1999
Face Recognition Using Active Appearance Models · ECCV (2) 1998
Active Appearance Models · ECCV (2) 1998
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape modeling
statistical shape model
0.122001
Active Appearance Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2001
Face Recognition Using Active Appearance Models · ECCV (2) 1998
Image and video processing
image registration
0.012001
Active Appearance Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2001
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face detection
face localization
0.011999
Advances in Active Appearance Models · ICCV 1999
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical search
0.011999
Advances in Active Appearance Models · ICCV 1999
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
subspace face recognition
0.011999
Simultaneous Extraction of Functional Face Subspaces · CVPR 1999
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
video-based face recognition
0.011999
Improving Identification Performance by Integrating Evidence from Sequences · CVPR 1999
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face modeling
0.011998
Active Appearance Models · ECCV (2) 1998
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face tracking
0.011998
Learning to Identify and Track Faces in Image Sequences · ICCV 1998
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking
0.011998
Learning to Identify and Track Faces in Image Sequences · ICCV 1998
Geometric modeling and processing
shape modeling
0.011998
Active Appearance Models · ECCV (2) 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

active appearance model · 0.1principal component analysis · 0.1sequence evidence integration · 0.0online learning · 0.0occlusion handling · 0.0hierarchical search · 0.0generative appearance model · 0.0appearance model · 0.0sequence tracking · 0.0face identification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Automatic extraction of the face identity-subspace
Nicholas Costen, Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
Image Vis. Comput.3
2001 Active Appearance Models
abstract
. We demonstrate a novel method of interpreting images using an Active Appearance Model (AAM). An AAM contains a statistical model of the shape and grey-level appearance of the object of interest which can generalise to almost any valid example. During a training phase we learn the relationship between model parameter displacements and the residual errors induced between a training image and a synthesised model example. To match to an image we measure the current residuals and use the model to predict changes to the current parameters, leading to a better fit. A good overall match is obtained in a few iterations, even from poor starting estimates. We describe the technique in detail and give results of quantitative performance tests. We anticipate that the AAM algorithm will be an important method for locating deformable objects in many applications. 1 Introduction Model-based approaches to the interpretation of images of variable objects are now attracting considerable interest [6][8...
Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1999 Comparing Active Shape Models with Active Appearance Models
abstract
Statistical models of the shape and appearance of image structures can be matched to new images using both the Active Shape Model [7] algorithm and the Active Appearance Model algorithm [2]. The former searches along profiles about the current model point positions to update the current estimate of the shape of the object. The latter samples the image data under the current instance and uses the difference between model and sample to update the appearance model parameters. In this paper we compare and contrast the two algorithms, giving the results of experiments testing their performance on two data sets, one of faces, the other of structures in MR brain sections. We find that the ASM is faster and achieves more accurate feature point location than the AAM, but the AAM gives a better match to the texture. 1 Introduction Interpretting images containing objects whose appearance can vary is difficult. A powerful approach has been to use deformable models, which can represent the variati...
Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
BMVC2
1999 Automatic Extraction of the Face Identity-Subspace
abstract
Facial variation divides into a number of functional subspaces, and ensemble-specific variation. An improved method of measuring these is presented, within the space defined by an Appearance Model. Initial estimates of the subspaces (lighting, pose, identity and expression) are obtained by Principal Components Analysis on appropriate groups of faces. An expectation-maximization algorithm is applied to image codings to maximise the probability of coding across these non-orthogonal subspaces. Ensemble specific variation is then removed by measuring the spatial predictability of the eigenvectors excluding those which are less predictable than the ensemble. These procedures significantly enhance identity recognition for a disjoint test set.
Nicholas Costen, Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
BMVC3
1999 Simultaneous Extraction of Functional Face Subspaces
abstract
Facial variation divides into a number of functional subspaces. An improved method of measuring these was designed within the space defined by an Appearance Model. Initial estimates of the subspaces (lighting, pose, identity, expression) were obtained by Principal Components Analysis on appropriate groups of faces. An iterative algorithm was applied to image codings to maximise the probability of coding across these non-orthogonal subspaces before obtaining the projection on each sub-space and recalculating the spaces. This procedure enhances identity recognition, reduces overall sub-space variance and produces Principal Components with greater span and less contamination.
Nicholas Costen, Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
CVPR3
1999 Improving Identification Performance by Integrating Evidence from Sequences
abstract
We present a quantitative evaluation of an algorithm for model-based face recognition. The algorithm actively learns how individual faces vary through video sequences, providing on-line suppression of confounding factors such as expression, lighting and pose. By actively decoupling sources of image variation, the algorithm provides a framework in which identity evidence can be integrated over a sequence. We demonstrate that face recognition can be considerably improved by the analysis of video sequences. The method presented is widely applicable in many multi-class interpretation problems.
Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
CVPR1
1999 Advances in Active Appearance Models
abstract
This paper presents advances in the construction and use of Active Appearance Models (AAMs) for image interpretation. AAMs are photo-realistic generative models of object appearance that can be used to rapidly locate deformable objects in images. We extend the AAM method to include coloured texture and present an enhanced search algorithm with the ability to locate partially occluded objects. Previously, AAMs have been limited by the need for good manual initialisation. In this paper, we describe a hierarchical search algorithm that overcomes this drawback. The extended AAM method provides a complete, unified scheme for model based image interpretation. We demonstrate the application of the scheme to the task of locating faces in images.
Gareth J. Edwards, Timothy F. Cootes, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
ICCV1
1998 A Comparative Evaluation of Active Appearance Model Algorithms
abstract
An Active Appearance Model (AAM) allows complex models of shape and appearance to be matched to new images rapidly. An AAM contains a statistical model of the shape and grey-level appearance of an object of interest The associated search algorithm exploits the locally linear relationship between model parameter displacements and the residual errors between model instance and image. This relationship can be learnt during a training phase. To match to an image we measure the current residuals and use the model to predict changes to the current parameters. The algorithm converges in a few iterations. In this paper we describe variations of the basic algorithm aimed at improving the speed and robustness of search. These include subsampling and using image residuals to drive the shape rather than full appearance model. We show examples of search and give the results of experiments comparing the performance of the different algorithms. 1 Introduction Model based methods are now widely used ...
Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
BMVC2
1998 Active Appearance Models
Timothy F. Cootes, Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
ECCV (2)2
1998 Face Recognition Using Active Appearance Models
Gareth J. Edwards, Timothy F. Cootes, Christopher J. Taylor 0001
ECCV (2)1
1998 Learning to Identify and Track Faces in Image Sequences
Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
FG1
1998 Interpreting Face Images Using Active Appearance Models
Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
FG1
1998 Learning to Identify and Track Faces in Image Sequences
Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
ICCV1
1998 Statistical models of face images - improving specificity
Gareth J. Edwards, Andreas Lanitis, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
Image Vis. Comput.1
1997 Learning to Identify and Track Faces in Image Sequences
Gareth J. Edwards, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
BMVC1
1996 Modelling the variability in face images
abstract
Model based approaches to the interpretation of face images have proved very successful. We have previously described statistically based models of face shape and grey-level appearance and shown how they can be used to perform various coding and interpretation tasks (Lanitis et al., 1995). In the paper we describe improved methods of modelling, which couple shape and grey-level information more directly than our existing methods, isolate the changes in appearance due to different sources of variability (person, expression, pose, lighting) and deal with nonlinear shape variation. We show that the new methods are better suited to interpretation and tracking tasks.
Gareth J. Edwards, Andreas Lanitis, Christopher J. Taylor 0001, Timothy F. Cootes
FG1