Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kléder Miranda Gonçalves

dblp:30/4619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.012000
A Group Critic System for Object-Oriented Analysis and Design · ASE 2000
Requirements engineering and software design › object-oriented analysis and design
object-oriented design
0.012000
A Group Critic System for Object-Oriented Analysis and Design · ASE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

argumentative hypermedia · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Using Critiquing Systems for Inconsistency Detection in Software Engineering Models
Cleidson R. B. de Souza, Hamilton L. R. Oliveira, Cleber R. P. da Rocha, Kléder Miranda Gonçalves, David F. Redmiles
SEKE4
2000 A Group Critic System for Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
abstract
Presents a group critic system for object-oriented analysis and design. A group critic system is a critiquing system which is aware that the problems it finds in the design are the result of different users acting on different goals, and all are responsible for the problem. The environment also integrates a construction kit and an argumentative hypermedia system. We used annotation to point out criticisms, so that users can view the critiquing system as a true colleague. Annotations are also used as the cooperation medium among the designers.
Cleidson R. B. de Souza, Jair S. Ferreira Jr., Kléder Miranda Gonçalves, Jacques Wainer
ASE3