Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mike Schneider

dblp:30/540 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input
in-vehicle interaction
0.112005
Calling while driving: effects of providing remote traffic context · CHI 2005
Usability and user experience research › safety-critical interaction
driver distraction
0.012005
Calling while driving: effects of providing remote traffic context · CHI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

driving simulator experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Virtual Humans with Secrets: Learning to Detect Verbal Cues to Deception
H. Chad Lane, Mike Schneider, Stephen W. Michael, Justin S. Albrechtsen, Christian A. Meissner
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2)2
2005 Calling while driving: effects of providing remote traffic context
abstract
Cell phone conversations distract drivers. This research explores the possibility of reducing distracting by providing callers with remote information about the driver's traffic. We asked whether providing such contextual information would change the caller's conversation such that drivers would be less distracted. In Experiment 1 we examined this question in a low-fidelity driving simulator; in Experiment 2 we examined this question in a higher fidelity simulator. In both experiments, remote callers and passengers were distracting. Providing traffic information to the remote caller significantly reduced crashes in the low fidelity tests and significantly reduced passing in the high fidelity tests, compared with the control conditions. We consider the implications for development of remote displays or signals to promote driving safety.
Mike Schneider, Sara B. Kiesler
CHI1