Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mike Schneider
dblp:30/540
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Usability and user experience research · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interaction techniques and input
in-vehicle interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Calling while driving: effects of providing remote traffic context · CHI 2005 |
Usability and user experience research › safety-critical interaction
driver distraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Calling while driving: effects of providing remote traffic context · CHI 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
driving simulator experiment · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Virtual Humans with Secrets: Learning to Detect Verbal Cues to Deception
H. Chad Lane, Mike Schneider, Stephen W. Michael, Justin S. Albrechtsen, Christian A. Meissner |
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2) | 2 |
| 2005 | Calling while driving: effects of providing remote traffic contextabstractCell phone conversations distract drivers. This research explores the possibility of reducing distracting by providing callers with remote information about the driver's traffic. We asked whether providing such contextual information would change the caller's conversation such that drivers would be less distracted. In Experiment 1 we examined this question in a low-fidelity driving simulator; in Experiment 2 we examined this question in a higher fidelity simulator. In both experiments, remote callers and passengers were distracting. Providing traffic information to the remote caller significantly reduced crashes in the low fidelity tests and significantly reduced passing in the high fidelity tests, compared with the control conditions. We consider the implications for development of remote displays or signals to promote driving safety. Mike Schneider, Sara B. Kiesler |
CHI | 1 |