Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emre Kazim

dblp:301/1271 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agentic AI
1.012026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation
1.012026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.312026
AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace-grounded failure detection · 2.0interactive knowledge graph · 2.0causal attribution · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AgentGraph: Trace-to-Graph Platform for Interactive Analysis and Robustness Testing in Agentic AI Systems
abstract
Modern Agentic AI systems plan, reason, and act across multiple steps, creating execution patterns that are difficult to interpret. Existing observability platforms track prompt I/O and operational metrics but require manual inspection of traces to reconstruct structure and reasoning. We present AgentGraph, which converts execution logs into interactive knowledge graphs and actionable insights. Nodes represent agents, tasks, tools, data inputs/outputs, and humans, while typed edges capture relations such as inputs consumed, tasks delegated or sequenced, tools required or used, outputs produced and delivered, and interventions from agents or humans. Each graph element links to its exact trace span, ensuring verifiability. Building on this representation, AgentGraph enables two analyses: qualitative trace-grounded failure detection and optimisation recommendations, and quantitative robustness evaluation via perturbation testing and causal attribution.
Zekun Wu 0003, Seonglae Cho, Cristian E. Muñoz Villalobos, Theo King, Umar Mohammed, Emre Kazim, María Pérez-Ortiz 0001, Sahan Bulathwela, Adriano S. Koshiyama
AAAI6
2025 SAGED: A Holistic Bias-Benchmarking Pipeline for Language Models with Customisable Fairness Calibration
abstract
The development of unbiased large language models is widely recognized as crucial, yet existing benchmarks fall short in detecting biases due to limited scope, contamination, and lack of a fairness baseline. SAGED(bias) is the first holistic benchmarking pipeline to address these problems. The pipeline encompasses five core stages: scraping materials, assembling benchmarks, generating responses, extracting numeric features, and diagnosing with disparity metrics. SAGED includes metrics for max disparity, such as impact ratio, and bias concentration, such as Max Z-scores. Noticing that metric tool bias and contextual bias in prompts can distort evaluation, SAGED implements counterfactual branching and baseline calibration for mitigation. For demonstration, we use SAGED on G20 Countries with popular 8b-level models including Gemma2, Llama3.1, Mistral, and Qwen2. With sentiment analysis, we find that while Mistral and Qwen2 show lower max disparity and higher bias concentration than Gemma2 and Llama3.1, all models are notably biased against countries like Russia and (except for Qwen2) China. With further experiments to have models role-playing U.S. presidents, we see bias amplifies and shifts in heterogeneous directions. Moreover, we see Qwen2 and Mistral not engage in role-playing, while Llama3.1 and Gemma2 role-play Trump notably more intensively than Biden and Harris, indicating role-playing performance bias in these models.
Nathaniel Demchak, Saloni Gupta, Ediz Ertekin Jr., Adriano S. Koshiyama, Emre Kazim, Zekun Wu 0003
COLING7