Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott Bressler
dblp:301/5334
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing
audio quality assessment |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010 |
Audio and music processing › source separation
reverberant source separation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010 |
Audio and music processing › source separation
separation evaluation metrics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010 |
Audio and music processing
source separation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
oracle mask · 0.2objective measure design · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant SpeechabstractThis paper examines the performance of several source separation systems on a speech separation task for which human intelligibility has previously been measured. For anechoic mixtures, automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance on the separated signals is quite similar to human performance. In reverberation, however, while signal separation has some benefit for ASR, the results are still far below those of human listeners facing the same task. Performing this same experiment with a number of oracle masks created witha prioriknowledge of the separated sources motivates a new objective measure of separation performance, the Direct-path, Early echo, and Reverberation, of the Target and Masker (DERTM), which is closely related to the ASR results. This measure indicates that while the non-oracle algorithms successfully reject the direct-path signal from the masking source, they reject less of its reverberation, explaining the disappointing ASR performance. Michael I. Mandel, Scott Bressler, Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham, Daniel P. W. Ellis |
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. | 2 |