Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott Bressler

dblp:301/5334 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
audio quality assessment
0.112010
Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Audio and music processing › source separation
reverberant source separation
0.112010
Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Audio and music processing › source separation
separation evaluation metrics
0.112010
Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Audio and music processing
source separation
0.112010
Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.012010
Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

oracle mask · 0.2objective measure design · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Evaluating Source Separation Algorithms With Reverberant Speech
abstract
This paper examines the performance of several source separation systems on a speech separation task for which human intelligibility has previously been measured. For anechoic mixtures, automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance on the separated signals is quite similar to human performance. In reverberation, however, while signal separation has some benefit for ASR, the results are still far below those of human listeners facing the same task. Performing this same experiment with a number of oracle masks created witha prioriknowledge of the separated sources motivates a new objective measure of separation performance, the Direct-path, Early echo, and Reverberation, of the Target and Masker (DERTM), which is closely related to the ASR results. This measure indicates that while the non-oracle algorithms successfully reject the direct-path signal from the masking source, they reject less of its reverberation, explaining the disappointing ASR performance.
Michael I. Mandel, Scott Bressler, Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham, Daniel P. W. Ellis
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.2