Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yining Lu

dblp:301/8432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 28% Language models and text generation · 20%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
fact-checking
0.912025
Optimizing Decomposition for Optimal Claim Verification · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.912025
RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
process supervision
0.912025
RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
analogy detection
0.812024
AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
RORA: Robust Free-Text Rationale Evaluation · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
rationale evaluation
0.812024
RORA: Robust Free-Text Rationale Evaluation · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.312025
Optimizing Decomposition for Optimal Claim Verification · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization › long-context modeling
long-context understanding
0.212024
AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.9process supervision · 0.9dynamic decomposition · 0.9bi-level optimization · 0.9robustness analysis · 0.8free-text rationale evaluation · 0.8benchmarking · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Learning to Optimize Multi-Objective Alignment Through Dynamic Reward Weighting
abstract
Abstract Prior works in multi-objective reinforcement learning typically use linear reward scalarization with fixed weights, which provably fail to capture non-convex Pareto fronts and thus yield suboptimal results. This limitation becomes especially critical in online preference alignment for large language models. Here, stochastic trajectories generated by parameterized policies create highly non-linear and non-convex mappings from parameters to objectives that no single static weighting scheme can find optimal trade-offs. We address this limitation by introducing dynamic reward weighting, which adaptively adjusts reward weights during the online reinforcement learning process. Unlike existing approaches that rely on fixed-weight interpolation, our dynamic weighting continuously balances and prioritizes objectives in training, facilitating effective exploration of Pareto fronts in objective space. We introduce two approaches of increasing sophistication and generalizability: hypervolume-guided weight adaptation and gradient-based weight optimization, offering a versatile toolkit for online multi-objective alignment. Our extensive experiments demonstrate their compatibility with commonly used online reinforcement learning algorithms, effectiveness across multiple datasets, and applicability to different model families, consistently achieving Pareto dominant solutions with fewer training steps than fixed-weight linear scalarization baselines.
Yining Lu, Changlong Yu, Qingyu Yin, Meng Jiang 0001
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics1
2025 RATIONALYST: Pre-training Process-Supervision for Improving Reasoning
abstract
Dongwei Jiang, Guoxuan Wang, Yining Lu, Andrew Wang, Jingyu Zhang, Chuyu Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Daniel Khashabi. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Dongwei Jiang, Guoxuan Wang, Yining Lu, Chuyu Liu, Benjamin Van Durme, Daniel Khashabi
ACL (1)3
2025 Optimizing Decomposition for Optimal Claim Verification
abstract
Current research on the Decompose-Then-Verify paradigm for evaluating the factuality of long-form text typically treats decomposition and verification in isolation, overlooking their interactions and potential misalignment.We find that existing decomposition policies, typically hand-crafted demonstrations, do not align well with downstream verifiers in terms of atomicity-a novel metric quantifying information density-leading to suboptimal verification results.We formulate finding the optimal decomposition policy for optimal verification as a bilevel optimization problem.To approximate a solution for this strongly NP-hard problem, we propose dynamic decomposition, a reinforcement learning framework that leverages verifier feedback to learn a policy for dynamically decomposing claims to verifier-preferred atomicity.Experimental results show that dynamic decomposition outperforms existing decomposition policies, improving verification confidence by 0.07 and accuracy by 0.12 (on a 0-1 scale) on average across varying verifiers, datasets, and atomcities of input claims.1
Yining Lu, Noah Ziems, Hy Dang, Meng Jiang 0001
ACL (1)1
2025 Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation
abstract
Yining Lu, Dixuan Wang, Tianjian Li, Dongwei Jiang, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Meng Jiang, Daniel Khashabi. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Yining Lu, Dixuan Wang, Tianjian Li, Dongwei Jiang, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Meng Jiang 0001, Daniel Khashabi
NAACL (Long Papers)1
2025 Closing the Online-Offline Gap: A Scalable Framework for Composed Model Evaluation
Mahanth Kumar Beeraka, Yining Lu, Briac Marcatte, Weikun Lyu, Brooke Bian, Enriko Aryanto, Ellie Wen, Mohamed A. Radwan, Tianshan Cui, Wenjing Lu, Mohsen Malmir, Yang Li 0267
RecSys3
2024 RORA: Robust Free-Text Rationale Evaluation
abstract
Zhengping Jiang, Yining Lu, Hanjie Chen, Daniel Khashabi, Benjamin Van Durme, Anqi Liu. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Zhengping Jiang, Yining Lu, Daniel Khashabi, Benjamin Van Durme, Anqi Liu 0001
ACL (1)2
2024 GEAR: Augmenting Language Models with Generalizable and Efficient Tool Resolution
abstract
Augmenting large language models (LLM) to use external tools enhances their performance across a variety of tasks.However, prior works over-rely on task-specific demonstration of tool use that limits their generalizability and computational cost due to making many calls to large-scale LLMs.We introduce GEAR, a computationally efficient query-tool grounding algorithm that is generalizable to various tasks that require tool use while not relying on taskspecific demonstrations.GEAR achieves better efficiency by delegating tool grounding and execution to small language models (SLM) and LLM, respectively; while leveraging semantic and pattern-based evaluation at both question and answer levels for generalizable tool grounding.We evaluate GEAR on 14 datasets across 6 downstream tasks, demonstrating its strong generalizability to novel tasks, tools and different SLMs.Despite offering more efficiency, GEAR achieves higher precision in tool grounding compared to prior strategies using LLM prompting, thus improving downstream accuracy at a reduced computational cost.For example, we demonstrate that GEAR-augmented GPT-J and GPT-3 outperform counterpart toolaugmented baselines because of better tool use.
Yining Lu, Haoping Yu, Daniel Khashabi
EACL (1)1
2024 AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies
abstract
Xiao Ye, Andrew Wang, Jacob Choi, Yining Lu, Shreya Sharma, Lingfeng Shen, Vijay Murari Tiyyala, Nicholas Andrews, Daniel Khashabi. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Jacob Choi, Yining Lu, Lingfeng Shen, Vijay Murari Tiyyala, Nicholas Andrews, Daniel Khashabi
EMNLP4
2021 Jointly Optimize Capacity, Latency and Engagement in Large-scale Recommendation Systems
abstract
As the recommendation systems behind commercial services scale up and apply more and more sophisticated machine learning models, it becomes important to optimize computational cost (capacity) and runtime latency, besides the traditional objective of user engagement. Caching recommended results and reusing them later is a common technique used to reduce capacity and latency. However, the standard caching approach negatively impacts user engagement. To overcome the challenge, this paper presents an approach to optimizing capacity, latency and engagement simultaneously. We propose a smart caching system including a lightweight adjuster model to refresh the cached ranking scores, achieving significant capacity savings without impacting ranking quality. To further optimize latency, we introduce a prefetching strategy which leverages the smart cache. Our production deployment on Facebook Marketplace demonstrates that the approach reduces capacity demand by 50% and p75 end-to-end latency by 35%. While Facebook Marketplace is used as a case study, the approach is applicable to other industrial recommendation systems as well.
Hitesh Khandelwal, Viet Ha-Thuc, Avishek Dutta, Yining Lu, Nan Du 0003
RecSys4