Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xunsong Li
dblp:304/1267
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-5803-6691ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Autonomous driving · 20% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Simultaneous Detection and Interaction Reasoning for Object-Centric Action Recognition · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025 Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › interaction modeling
interaction reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Simultaneous Detection and Interaction Reasoning for Object-Centric Action Recognition · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
compositional action recognition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Simultaneous Detection and Interaction Reasoning for Object-Centric Action Recognition · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action Recognition · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
patch-based object decoder · 0.9object relation modeling · 0.9interactive object refining and aggregation · 0.9counterfactual inference · 0.5causal graph · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Simultaneous Detection and Interaction Reasoning for Object-Centric Action RecognitionabstractThe interactions between human and objects are important for recognizing object-centric actions. Existing methods usually adopt a two-stage pipeline, where object proposals are first detected using a pretrained detector, and then are fed to an action recognition model for extracting video features and learning the object relations for action recognition. However, since the action prior is unknown in the object detection stage, important objects could be easily overlooked, leading to inferior action recognition performance. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end object-centric action recognition framework that simultaneously performsDetectionAndInteractionReasoning (dubbed DAIR) in one stage. Particularly, after extracting video features using a base network, we design three consecutive modules for simultaneously learning object detection and interaction reasoning. Firstly, we build a Patch-based Object Decoder (PatchDec) to generate object proposals from video patch tokens. Then, we design an Interactive Object Refining and Aggregation (IRA) to identify the interactive objects that are important for action recognition. The IRA module adjusts the interactiveness scores of proposals based on their relative position and appearance, and aggregates the object-level information into global video representation. Finally, we build an Object Relation Modeling (ORM) module to encode the object relations. These three modules together with the video feature extractor can be trained jointly in an end-to-end fashion, thus avoiding the heavy reliance on an off-the-shelf object detector, and reducing the multi-stage training burden. We conduct experiments on two datasets, Something-Else and Ikea-Assembly, to evaluate the performance of our proposed approach on conventional, compositional, and few-shot action recognition tasks. Through in-depth experimental analysis, we show the crucial role ofinteractiveobjects in learning for action recognition, and we can outperform state-of-the-art methods on both datasets. We hope our DAIR can provide a new perspective for object-centric action recognition. Xunsong Li, Pengzhan Sun 0001, Yangcen Liu, Lixin Duan, Wen Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Multim. | 1 |
| 2021 | Counterfactual Debiasing Inference for Compositional Action RecognitionabstractCompositional action recognition is a novel challenge in the computer vision community and focuses on revealing the different combinations of verbs and nouns instead of treating subject-object interactions in videos as individual instances only. Existing methods tackle this challenging task by simply ignoring appearance information or fusing object appearances with dynamic instance tracklets. However, those strategies usually do not perform well for unseen action instances. For that, in this work we propose a novel learning framework called Counterfactual Debiasing Network (CDN) to improve the model generalization ability by removing the interference introduced by visual appearances of objects/subjects. It explicitly learns the appearance information in action representations and later removes the effect of such information in a causal inference manner. Specifically, we use tracklets and video content to model the factual inference by considering both appearance information and structure information. In contrast, only video content with appearance information is leveraged in the counterfactual inference. With the two inferences, we conduct a causal graph which captures and removes the bias introduced by the appearance information by subtracting the result of the counterfactual inference from that of the factual inference. By doing that, our proposed CDN method can better recognize unseen action instances by debiasing the effect of appearances. Extensive experiments on the Something-Else dataset clearly show the effectiveness of our proposed CDN over existing state-of-the-art methods. Pengzhan Sun 0001, Bo Wu 0018, Xunsong Li, Wen Li 0001, Lixin Duan, Chuang Gan 0001 |
ACM Multimedia | 3 |