Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chenhao Ye

dblp:304/2139 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
5 papers
Storage systems · 51% Cloud and datacenter computing · 38% Distributed systems · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › file systems › file system design
user space file system
1.222023
MadFS: Per-File Virtualization for Userspace Persistent Memory Filesystems · FAST 2023
Scale and Performance in a Filesystem Semi-Microkernel · SOSP 2021
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation
multi-resource allocation
1.012026
Cache-Centric Multi-Resource Allocation for Storage Services · FAST 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management
1.012026
Cache-Centric Multi-Resource Allocation for Storage Services · FAST 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage
0.912025
Cloudscape: A Study of Storage Services in Modern Cloud Architectures · FAST 2025
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
optimistic concurrency control
0.712023
Polaris: Enabling Transaction Priority in Optimistic Concurrency Control · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Transaction processing and concurrency control › transaction scheduling
transaction prioritization
0.712023
Polaris: Enabling Transaction Priority in Optimistic Concurrency Control · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Storage systems › file systems › file system design
persistent memory file system
0.712023
MadFS: Per-File Virtualization for Userspace Persistent Memory Filesystems · FAST 2023
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.612022
Using Trātṛ to tame Adversarial Synchronization · USENIX Security Symposium 2022
Distributed computing theory › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance
0.612022
Using Trātṛ to tame Adversarial Synchronization · USENIX Security Symposium 2022
Operating systems › kernel
kernel design
0.512021
Scale and Performance in a Filesystem Semi-Microkernel · SOSP 2021
Storage systems
file systems
0.512021
Scale and Performance in a Filesystem Semi-Microkernel · SOSP 2021
Memory systems › non-volatile memory
persistent memory
0.212023
MadFS: Per-File Virtualization for Userspace Persistent Memory Filesystems · FAST 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trātṛ · 1.1lock-free concurrent data structures · 1.0inode migration · 1.0dynamic scaling · 1.0reservation mechanism · 0.7abort-aware priority assignment · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Cache-Centric Multi-Resource Allocation for Storage Services
Chenhao Ye, Shawn Zhong, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau
FAST1
2025 Cloudscape: A Study of Storage Services in Modern Cloud Architectures
Sambhav Satija, Chenhao Ye, Ranjitha Kosgi, Romit Kankaria, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau, Kiran Srinivasan
FAST2
2025 Distill To Detect: Amplifying Anomalies in Backdoor Models through Knowledge Distillation
abstract
Backdoor attacks represent a significant threat to the security of deep learning models. Due to the stealthiness of backdoor attacks, effectively detecting whether a model has been compromised by such attacks remains a major challenge. Previous backdoor detection methods either rely on backdoor datasets to identify anomalies in backdoor samples or depend on prior knowledge of existing backdoor attacks. This results in difficulties in detecting backdoors when backdoor samples are unavailable and leads to poor generalization capabilities when addressing new attack methods. This work proposes a novel approach for detecting backdoor attacks called Distill To Detect (D2D), that does not depend on backdoor samples or any prior knowledge. It utilizes knowledge distillation to amplify more general and universal backdoor anomalies exhibited on clean samples for detection. This approach is not only more efficient but also exhibits strong generalization capabilities, enabling the detection of most backdoor attacks with low time and computational costs. We tested our approach against six backdoor attacks and three different model architectures, demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Xuyang Teng, Wenpeng Xing, Chenhao Ye
ICASSP5
2025 BEA-UNet: Boundary-Enhanced Dual Attention UNet for Medical Image Segmentation
Chenhao Ye, Changyu Zhu, Guangping Xu
ICIC (28)1
2025 FedGDA: A Federated Domain Alignment Approach for Multi-robot Maze Exploration
Chenhao Ye, Hongxue Huang
PRCV (11)1
2023 MadFS: Per-File Virtualization for Userspace Persistent Memory Filesystems
Shawn Zhong, Chenhao Ye, Guanzhou Hu, Suyan Qu, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau, Michael M. Swift
FAST2
2023 Polaris: Enabling Transaction Priority in Optimistic Concurrency Control
abstract
Transaction priority is a critical feature for real-world database systems. Under high contention, certain classes of transactions should be given a higher chance to commit than others. Such a prioritization mechanism is commonly implemented in locking-based concurrency control protocols as some lock scheduling mechanisms, but it is rarely supported in the world of optimistic concurrency control. We present Polaris, an optimistic concurrency control protocol that supports multiple priority levels. To enforce priority, Polaris introduces a minimal amount of pessimism through a lightweight reservation mechanism. The protocol is fully optimistic among transactions within the same priority level and preserves the high throughput advantage of optimistic protocols. Our evaluation with YCSB workload shows that Polaris can make the p999 tail latency of high-priority transactions 13x lower than that of low-priority ones. With an abort-aware priority assignment policy, Polaris can deliver 1.9x higher throughput and 17x lower tail latency compared to Silo for high-contention workloads.
Chenhao Ye, Wuh-Chwen Hwang, Xiangyao Yu
Proc. ACM Manag. Data1
2022 Using Trātṛ to tame Adversarial Synchronization
Yuvraj Patel, Chenhao Ye, Akshat Sinha, Abigail Matthews, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Michael M. Swift
USENIX Security Symposium2
2021 Scale and Performance in a Filesystem Semi-Microkernel
abstract
We present uFS, a user-level filesystem semi-microkernel. uFS takes advantage of a high-performance storage development kit to realize a fully-functional, crash-consistent, highly-scalable filesystem, with relative developer ease. uFS delivers scalable high performance with a number of novel techniques: careful partitioning of in-memory and on-disk data structures to enable concurrent access without locking, inode migration for balancing load across filesystem threads, and a dynamic scaling algorithm for determining the number of filesystem threads to serve the current workload. Through measurements, we show that uFS has good base performance and excellent scalability; for example, uFS delivers nearly twice the throughput of ext4 for LevelDB on YCSB workloads.
Jing Liu 0074, Anthony Rebello, Chenhao Ye, Sudarsun Kannan, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau
SOSP4