Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mario Laux

dblp:304/4146 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › geometric motion planning
geodesic motion planning
1.222023
Boundary Conditions in Geodesic Motion Planning for Manipulators · ICRA 2023
Robot Arm Motion Planning Based on Geodesics · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
1.222023
Boundary Conditions in Geodesic Motion Planning for Manipulators · ICRA 2023
Robot Arm Motion Planning Based on Geodesics · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
1.222023
Boundary Conditions in Geodesic Motion Planning for Manipulators · ICRA 2023
Robot Arm Motion Planning Based on Geodesics · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › replanning
dynamic replanning
0.212023
Boundary Conditions in Geodesic Motion Planning for Manipulators · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-scaling algorithms · 0.7generalized coordinates · 0.7metric construction · 0.5geodesic computation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Boundary Conditions in Geodesic Motion Planning for Manipulators
abstract
In dynamic environments, robotic manipulators and especially cobots must be able to react to changing circumstances while in motion. This substantiates the need for quick trajectory planning algorithms that are able to cope with arbitrary velocity and acceleration boundary conditions. Apart from dynamic re-planning, being able to seamlessly join trajectories together opens the door for divide-and-conquer-type algorithms to focus on the individual parts of a motion separately. While geodesic motion planning has proven that it can produce very smooth and efficient actuator movement, the problem of incorporating non-zero boundary conditions has not been addressed yet. We show how a set of generalized coordinates can be used to transition between boundary conditions and free movement in an optimal way while still retaining the known advantages of geodesic planners. We also outline, how our approach can be combined with the family of time-scaling algorithms for further improvement of the generated trajectories.
Mario Laux, Andreas Zell
ICRA1
2021 Robot Arm Motion Planning Based on Geodesics
abstract
Naturally, finding joint trajectories for robotic manipulators involves competing optimization goals. On the one hand, the end-effector should move along a predictable and short path while on the other hand joint movement and acceleration should be kept to a minimum. Obstacles in the workspace or joint limits complicate the situation even further. Constructing a metric that makes undesired configurations more expensive to travel through, we equip the joint space with a notion of cost. The motion planning task then reduces to the problem of finding cheapest paths connecting two configurations – so-called geodesics. We show how to construct suitable metrics for a variety of typical scenarios and present an efficient algorithm for the computation of the corresponding geodesics. Our approach makes it very easy to balance different optimization goals and produces natural and smooth manipulator movement.
Mario Laux, Andreas Zell
ICRA1