Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Drake Taylor

dblp:304/4299 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
leg design
0.512021
A Unified Optimization Framework and New Set of Performance Metrics for Robot Leg Design · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
locomotion control
0.112021
A Unified Optimization Framework and New Set of Performance Metrics for Robot Leg Design · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-objective optimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A Unified Optimization Framework and New Set of Performance Metrics for Robot Leg Design
abstract
This work presents a framework for the simultaneous optimization of motors, transmissions, and mechanisms of different joints of robotic legs with the goal of achieving an energy efficient, precisely controllable and stable locomotion in dynamic environments. This unified framework allowed us to introduce and formulate new performance metrics for the separate evaluation of the system's stabilizing ability during stance and swing. Moreover, through a case study, this design optimization framework was applied to an anthropomorphic robot leg model and the optimal actuation configurations for the leg were obtained. This case study also helped us investigate the relationships among our three objectives (energy efficiency, and stance and swing control). It was shown that while in some cases a clear trade-off exists, it is not always valid and as such, careful consideration of all three objectives is necessary.
Chathura L. Semasinghe, Drake Taylor, Siavash Rezazadeh
ICRA2