Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Janina Reuter

dblp:304/7644 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-9758-9620ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 54% Algorithms and data structures · 26% Computational complexity · 20%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
1.322024
Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2024
Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs · SODA 2022
Computational complexity
parameterized complexity
1.322024
Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2024
Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs · SODA 2022
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.912025
Faster Lattice Basis Computation via a Natural Generalization of the Euclidean Algorithm · STOC 2025
Algorithms and data structures › number-theoretic algorithms › euclidean algorithm
euclidean algorithm generalization
0.912025
Faster Lattice Basis Computation via a Natural Generalization of the Euclidean Algorithm · STOC 2025
Algorithms and data structures › number-theoretic algorithms
lattice algorithms
0.912025
Faster Lattice Basis Computation via a Natural Generalization of the Euclidean Algorithm · STOC 2025
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
block-structured integer programming
0.812024
Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2024
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic programming
stochastic integer programming
0.612022
Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs · SODA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

euclidean algorithm · 0.9proximity bounds · 0.8graver complexity · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On Integer Programs That Look Like Paths
Marcin Brianski, Alexandra Lassota, Kristýna Pekárková, Michal Pilipczuk, Janina Reuter
IPCO5
2025 Faster Lattice Basis Computation via a Natural Generalization of the Euclidean Algorithm
Kim-Manuel Klein, Janina Reuter
STOC2
2024 Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs
abstract
In this article, we study the computational complexity of solving a class of block structured integer programs (IPs), the so-called multistage stochastic IPs. A multistage stochastic IP is an IP of the form min { c T x | Ax = b , x ≥ 0, x integral} where the constraint matrix \({A}\) consists of small block matrices ordered on the diagonal line, and for each stage there are larger blocks with few columns connecting the blocks in a treelike fashion. Over the past few years there was enormous progress in the area of block structured IPs. For many of the known block IP classes, such as n -fold, tree-fold, and two-stage stochastic IPs, nearly matching upper and lower bounds are known concerning their computational complexity. One of the major gaps that remained, however, was the parameter dependency in the running time for an algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs. Previous algorithms require a tower of t exponentials, where t is the number of stages. In contrast, only a double exponential lower bound was known based on the exponential time hypothesis. In this article, we show that the tower of t exponentials is actually not necessary. We show an improved running time of \(2^{(d\Vert A \Vert _\infty)^{\mathcal {O}(d^{3t+1})}} \cdot rn\log ^{\mathcal {O}(2^d)}(rn)\) for the algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs, where d is the sum of columns in the connecting blocks and rn is the number of rows. Hence, we obtain the first bound by an elementary function for the running time of an algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs. In contrast to previous works, our algorithm has only a triple exponential dependency on the parameters and only doubly exponential for every constant t . By this, we come very close to the known double exponential bound that holds already for two-stage stochastic IPs, i.e., multistage stochastic IPs with two stages. The improved running time of the algorithm is based on new bounds for the proximity of multistage stochastic IPs. The idea behind the bound is based on generalization of a structural lemma originally used for two-stage stochastic IPs. While the structural lemma requires iteration to be applied to multistage stochastic IPs, our generalization directly applies to inherent combinatorial properties of multiple stages. Already a special case of our lemma yields an improved bound for the Graver complexity of multistage stochastic IPs.
Kim-Manuel Klein, Janina Reuter
ACM Trans. Algorithms2
2022 Collapsing the Tower - On the Complexity of Multistage Stochastic IPs
abstract
In this paper we study the computational complexity of solving a class of block structured integer programs (IPs) - so called multistage stochastic IPs. A multistage stochastic IP is an IP of the form where the constraint matrix consists of small block matrices ordered on the diagonal line and for each stage there are larger blocks with few columns connecting the blocks in a tree like fashion. Over the last years there was enormous progress in the area of block structured IPs. For many of the known block IP classes - such as n-fold, tree-fold, and two-stage stochastic IPs, nearly matching upper and lower bounds are known concerning their computational complexity. One of the major gaps that remained however was the parameter dependency in the running time for an algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs. Previous algorithms require a tower of t exponentials, where t is the number of stages, while only a double exponential lower bound was known. In this paper we show that the tower of t exponentials is actually not necessary. We can show an improved running time for the algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs with a running time of , where d is the sum of columns in the connecting blocks and n is the number of blocks on the lowest stage. Hence, we obtain the first bound by an elementary function for the running time of an algorithm solving multistage stochastic IPs. In contrast to previous works, our algorithm has only a triple exponential dependency on the parameters and only doubly exponential for every constant t. By this we come very close the known double exponential bound (based on the exponential time hypothesis) that holds already for two-stage stochastic IPs, i.e. multistage stochastic IPs with only two stages. The improved running time of the algorithm is based on new bounds for the proximity of multistage stochastic IPs. The idea behind the bound is based on generalization for a structural lemma originally used for two-stage stochastic IPs. While the structural lemma requires iteration to be applied to multistage stochastic IPs, our generalization directly applies to inherent combinatorial properties of multiple stages. Already a special case of our lemma yields an improved bound for the Graver Complexity of multistage stochastic IPs.
Kim-Manuel Klein, Janina Reuter
SODA2