Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philine Lou Bommer
dblp:305/3617
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 51% Trustworthy machine learning · 49% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description Framework · NeurIPS 2025 CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of Neurons · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
dynamical system |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamical Systems from Multi-Modal Time Series · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
expectation-maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamical Systems from Multi-Modal Time Series · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamical Systems from Multi-Modal Time Series · ICML 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamical Systems from Multi-Modal Time Series · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.1recurrent neural network · 1.1generalized linear model · 1.1expectation-maximization · 1.1large language model · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9generative model · 0.8concept synthesis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description FrameworkabstractAutomated interpretability research aims to identify concepts encoded in neural network features to enhance human understanding of model behavior. Within the context of large language models (LLMs) for natural language processing (NLP), current automated neuron-level feature description methods face two key challenges: limited robustness and the assumption that each neuron encodes a single concept (monosemanticity), despite increasing evidence of polysemanticity. This assumption restricts the expressiveness of feature descriptions and limits their ability to capture the full range of behaviors encoded in model internals. To address this, we introduce Polysemantic FeatuRe Identification and Scoring Method (PRISM), a novel framework specifically designed to capture the complexity of features in LLMs. Unlike approaches that assign a single description per neuron, common in many automated interpretability methods in NLP, PRISM produces more nuanced descriptions that account for both monosemantic and polysemantic behavior. We apply PRISM to LLMs and, through extensive benchmarking against existing methods, demonstrate that our approach produces more accurate and faithful feature descriptions, improving both overall description quality (via a description score) and the ability to capture distinct concepts when polysemanticity is present (via a polysemanticity score). Laura Kopf, Nils Feldhus, Kirill Bykov, Philine Lou Bommer, Anna Hedström, Marina M.-C. Höhne, Oliver Eberle |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of NeuronsabstractA crucial aspect of understanding the complex nature of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) is the ability to explain learned concepts within their latent representations. While methods exist to connect neurons to human-understandable textual descriptions, evaluating the quality of these explanations is challenging due to the lack of a unified quantitative approach. We introduce CoSy (Concept Synthesis), a novel, architecture-agnostic framework for evaluating textual explanations of latent neurons. Given textual explanations, our proposed framework uses a generative model conditioned on textual input to create data points representing the explanations. By comparing the neuron's response to these generated data points and control data points, we can estimate the quality of the explanation. We validate our framework through sanity checks and benchmark various neuron description methods for Computer Vision tasks, revealing significant differences in quality. Laura Kopf, Philine Lou Bommer, Anna Hedström, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Marina M.-C. Höhne, Kirill Bykov |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Reconstructing Nonlinear Dynamical Systems from Multi-Modal Time SeriesabstractEmpirically observed time series in physics, biology, or medicine, are commonly generated by some underlying dynamical system (DS) which is the target of scientific interest. There is an increasing interest to harvest machine learning methods to reconstruct this latent DS in a data-driven, unsupervised way. In many areas of science it is common to sample time series observations from many data modalities simultaneously, e.g. electrophysiological and behavioral time series in a typical neuroscience experiment. However, current machine learning tools for reconstructing DSs usually focus on just one data modality. Here we propose a general framework for multi-modal data integration for the purpose of nonlinear DS reconstruction and the analysis of cross-modal relations. This framework is based on dynamically interpretable recurrent neural networks as general approximators of nonlinear DSs, coupled to sets of modality-specific decoder models from the class of generalized linear models. Both an expectation-maximization and a variational inference algorithm for model training are advanced and compared. We show on nonlinear DS benchmarks that our algorithms can efficiently compensate for too noisy or missing information in one data channel by exploiting other channels, and demonstrate on experimental neuroscience data how the algorithm learns to link different data domains to the underlying dynamics. Daniel Kramer, Philine Lou Bommer, Daniel Durstewitz, Carlo Tombolini, Georgia Koppe |
ICML | 2 |