Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Adendorf

dblp:305/6694 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 91% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › sentiment classification
polarity classification
0.512021
Come hither or go away? Recognising pre-electoral coalition signals in the news · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
political text analysis
0.512021
Come hither or go away? Recognising pre-electoral coalition signals in the news · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
stance detection
0.512021
Come hither or go away? Recognising pre-electoral coalition signals in the news · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › cross-lingual transfer
multilingual transfer
0.112021
Come hither or go away? Recognising pre-electoral coalition signals in the news · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 0.5multi-task learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Come hither or go away? Recognising pre-electoral coalition signals in the news
abstract
In this paper, we introduce the task of political coalition signal prediction from text, that is, the task of recognizing from the news coverage leading up to an election the (un)willingness of political parties to form a government coalition.We decompose our problem into two related, but distinct tasks: (i) predicting whether a reported statement from a politician or a journalist refers to a potential coalition and (ii) predicting the polarity of the signal -namely, whether the speaker is in favour of or against the coalition.For this, we explore the benefits of multi-task learning and investigate which setup and task formulation is best suited for each sub-task.We evaluate our approach, based on hand-coded newspaper articles, covering elections in three countries (Ireland, Germany, Austria) and two languages (English, German).Our results show that the multi-task learning approach can further improve results over a strong monolingual transfer learning baseline.* election * AND ( * coalition * OR * pact * OR * collaboration * OR * alliance * ) 1The keyword-based sampling was necessary so that the coders did not spend too much time on articles that did not contain any signals.The keywords were optimised for recall by domain experts who,
Ines Rehbein, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Anna Adendorf, Oke Bahnsen, Lukas Stoetzer, Heiner Stuckenschmidt
EMNLP (1)3