Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pratinav Seth
dblp:305/7312
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-4525-4464ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 63% Segmentation and scene understanding · 18% Language models and text generation · 6% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 50% Information retrieval · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Environmental and earth informatics · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Orion-Bix: Bi-Axial Attention for Tabular In-Context Learning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular deep learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Orion-Bix: Bi-Axial Attention for Tabular In-Context Learning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › foundation model
tabular foundation model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Orion-Bix: Bi-Axial Attention for Tabular In-Context Learning · WWW 2026 |
Information retrieval
in-context learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Exploring Fine-Tuning for Tabular Foundation Models · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning and data management › tabular data learning
tabular foundation model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Exploring Fine-Tuning for Tabular Foundation Models · WWW 2026 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
remote sensing image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Alberta Wells Dataset: Pinpointing Oil and Gas Wells from Satellite Imagery · ICML 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics
remote sensing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Alberta Wells Dataset: Pinpointing Oil and Gas Wells from Satellite Imagery · ICML 2025 |
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
satellite imagery analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Alberta Wells Dataset: Pinpointing Oil and Gas Wells from Satellite Imagery · ICML 2025 |
Image and video processing › image fusion
multi-modal image fusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LaMAR: Laplacian Pyramid for Multimodal Adaptive Super Resolution (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LaMAR: Laplacian Pyramid for Multimodal Adaptive Super Resolution (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Orion-Bix: Bi-Axial Attention for Tabular In-Context Learning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Exploring Fine-Tuning for Tabular Foundation Models · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › few-shot learning
tabular few-shot learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Orion-Bix: Bi-Axial Attention for Tabular In-Context Learning · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
meta-learning · 3.0supervised fine-tuning · 2.0parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 2.0multispectral imagery · 1.7baseline detection and segmentation algorithms · 1.7in-context learning · 1.0attention mechanism · 1.0laplacian pyramid · 0.8deep learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Orion-Bix: Bi-Axial Attention for Tabular In-Context LearningabstractTabular data drive most real-world machine learning applications, yet building general-purpose models for them remains difficult. Mixed numeric and categorical fields, weak feature structure, and limited labeled data make scaling and generalization challenging. To this end, we introduce Orion-Bix, a tabular foundation model that combines biaxial attention with meta-learned in-context reasoning for few-shot tabular learning. Its encoder alternates standard, grouped, hierarchical, and relational attention, fusing their outputs through multi-CLS summarization to capture both local and global dependencies efficiently. A label-aware ICL head adapts on the fly and scales to large label spaces via hierarchical decision routing. Meta-trained on synthetically generated, structurally diverse tables with causal priors, Orion-Bix learns transferable inductive biases across heterogeneous data. Delivered as a scikit-learn compatible foundation model, it outperforms gradient-boosting baselines and remains competitive with state-of-the-art tabular foundation models on public benchmarks, showing that biaxial attention with episodic meta-training enables robust, few-shot-ready tabular learning. The model is publicly available at https://github.com/Lexsi-Labs/Orion-BiX . Mohamed Bouadi, Pratinav Seth, Aditya Tanna, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu |
WWW | 2 |
| 2026 | Exploring Fine-Tuning for Tabular Foundation ModelsabstractTabular Foundation Models (TFMs) have recently shown strong in-context learning capabilities on structured data, achieving zero-shot performance comparable to traditional machine learning methods. We find that zero-shot TFMs already achieve strong performance, while the benefits of fine-tuning are highly model- and data-dependent. Meta-learning and PEFT provide moderate gains under specific conditions, whereas full supervised fine-tuning often reduces accuracy or calibration quality. This work presents the first comprehensive study of fine-tuning in TFMs across benchmarks including TALENT, OpenML-CC18, and TabZilla. We compare zero-shot, meta-learning, supervised (SFT), and parameter-efficient (PEFT) approaches, analyzing how dataset factors such as imbalance, size, and dimensionality affect outcomes. Our findings cover performance, calibration, and fairness, offering practical guidelines on when fine-tuning is most beneficial and its limitations. Aditya Tanna, Pratinav Seth, Mohamed Bouadi, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu |
WWW | 2 |
| 2025 | Alberta Wells Dataset: Pinpointing Oil and Gas Wells from Satellite ImageryabstractMillions of abandoned oil and gas wells are scattered across the world, leaching methane into the atmosphere and toxic compounds into the groundwater. Many of these locations are unknown, preventing the wells from being plugged and their polluting effects averted. Remote sensing is a relatively unexplored tool for pinpointing abandoned wells at scale. We introduce the first large-scale Benchmark dataset for this problem, leveraging high-resolution multi-spectral satellite imagery from Planet Labs. Our curated Dataset comprises over 213,000 wells (abandoned, suspended, and active) from Alberta, a region with especially high well density, sourced from the Alberta Energy Regulator and verified by domain experts. We evaluate baseline algorithms for well detection and segmentation, showing the promise of computer vision approaches but also significant room for improvement. Pratinav Seth, Michelle P. Lin, Brefo Yaw Dwamena, Jade Boutot, Mary Kang, David Rolnick |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | DLBacktrace: Model Agnostic Explainability for any Deep Learning ModelabstractThe rapid growth of AI has led to more complex deep learning models, often operating as opaque "black boxes" with limited transparency in their decision-making. This lack of interpretability poses challenges, especially in high-stakes applications where understanding model output is crucial. This work highlights the importance of interpretability in fostering trust, accountability, and responsible deployment. To address these challenges, we introduce DLBacktrace, a novel, model-agnostic technique designed to provide clear insights into deep learning model decisions across a wide range of domains and architectures, including MLPs, CNNs, and Transformer-based LLM models. We present a comprehensive overview of DLBacktrace and benchmark its performance against established interpretability methods such as SHAP, LIME, and GradCAM. Our results demonstrate that DLBacktrace effectively enhances understanding of model behavior across diverse tasks. DLBacktrace is compatible with models developed in both PyTorch and TensorFlow, supporting architectures such as BERT, ResNet, U-Net, and custom DNNs for tabular data. The library is open-sourced and available at https://github.com/AryaXAI/DLBacktrace. Vinay Kumar Sankarapu, Chintan Chitroda, Yashwardhan Rathore, Pratinav Seth |
IJCNN | 5 |
| 2024 | LaMAR: Laplacian Pyramid for Multimodal Adaptive Super Resolution (Student Abstract)abstractRecent advances in image-to-image translation involve the integration of non-visual imagery in deep models. Non-visual sensors, although more costly, often produce low-resolution images. To combat this, methods using RGB images to enhance the resolution of these modalities have been introduced. Fusing these modalities to achieve high-resolution results demands models with millions of parameters and extended inference times. We present LaMAR, a lightweight model. It employs Laplacian image pyramids combined with a low-resolution thermal image for Guided Thermal Super Resolution. By decomposing the RGB image into a Laplacian pyramid, LaMAR preserves image details and avoids high-resolution feature map computations, ensuring efficiency. With faster inference times and fewer parameters, our model demonstrates state-of-the-art results. Aditya Kasliwal, Aryan Kamani, Ishaan Gakhar, Pratinav Seth, Sriya Rallabandi |
AAAI | 4 |