Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammad Yousefi 0001

dblp:307/5168-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-5360-9154ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 95% Reinforcement learning · 5%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
2.532025
Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis · KR 2025
How Good is Perfect? On the Incompleteness of A* for Total-Order HTN Planning · ICAPS 2025
Laying the Foundations for Solving FOND HTN Problems: Grounding, Search, Heuristics (and Benchmark Problems) · IJCAI 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › best-first search
a* search
0.912025
How Good is Perfect? On the Incompleteness of A* for Total-Order HTN Planning · ICAPS 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.912025
How Good is Perfect? On the Incompleteness of A* for Total-Order HTN Planning · ICAPS 2025
Computational complexity
undecidability
0.912025
Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis · KR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
planning heuristics
0.812024
Laying the Foundations for Solving FOND HTN Problems: Grounding, Search, Heuristics (and Benchmark Problems) · IJCAI 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.312025
Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis · KR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov decision process · 1.7computational complexity analysis · 1.7heuristic search · 0.9graph search · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 How Good is Perfect? On the Incompleteness of A* for Total-Order HTN Planning
abstract
This paper reveals the inherent limitations of A* in HTN planning by identifying various cycle types induced by the task hierarchy and analyzing their effects on the termination of the algorithm. We prove that A* even with the perfect heuristic, and for the special case of totally ordered problems, which are known to be decidable, is incomplete. An especially interesting results is that having a visited list (i.e., graph search) with the null heuristic has better termination guarantees than tree search with the perfect heuristic. We provide a polynomial-time test for detecting those cycles that render A* incomplete, and analyzed all existing benchmark domains from the most-recent international planning competition. Results show that in more than half of all domains, A* tree search would be incomplete even with the perfect heuristic, and in roughly 40% of cases A* graph search might also be incomplete depending on the provided heuristic function. We also point to a normal form that preserves semantics and guarantees completeness of the resulting models, though implementation and testing remains for future work.
Mohammad Yousefi 0001, Mario Schmautz, Patrik Haslum, Pascal Bercher
ICAPS1
2025 Probabilistic HTN Planning: Formalization and Computational Complexity Analysis
abstract
Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning is an approach to sequential decision making that allows expressing complex grammar-like path constraints. In this paper, we first introduce an extension to HTN planning that takes probabilistic outcomes into account, and then study the computational complexity of deciding such problems either by finding a fixed sequence of actions (i.e., a conformant solution) or an outcome-dependent policy. This formalization extends factored Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) to have a hierarchical structure. In all studied cases, the conformant solutions are harder to obtain than their non-deterministic analogues, whereas policies are not always harder. Surprisingly, unlike their deterministic counterparts, severely restricted cases of probabilistic HTN problems are proven to be undecidable. The result holds even if all of the transition probabilities are bounded to be 0, 0.5, or 1.
Mohammad Yousefi 0001, Johannes Schmalz, Patrik Haslum, Pascal Bercher
KR1
2024 Laying the Foundations for Solving FOND HTN Problems: Grounding, Search, Heuristics (and Benchmark Problems)
Mohammad Yousefi 0001, Pascal Bercher
IJCAI1