Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Meixi Zheng

dblp:308/5395 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-9955-9117ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 83% Learning paradigms · 6% Optimization for machine learning · 6%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
2.022026
Seeking Flat Minima Over Diverse Surrogates for Improved Adversarial Transferability: A Theoretical Framework and Algorithmic Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Systematic Survey From the Lifecycle Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
1.012026
Seeking Flat Minima Over Diverse Surrogates for Improved Adversarial Transferability: A Theoretical Framework and Algorithmic Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense
1.012026
Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Systematic Survey From the Lifecycle Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
adversarial machine learning
1.012026
Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Systematic Survey From the Lifecycle Perspective · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability
1.012026
Seeking Flat Minima Over Diverse Surrogates for Improved Adversarial Transferability: A Theoretical Framework and Algorithmic Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
black-box adversarial attack
1.012026
Seeking Flat Minima Over Diverse Surrogates for Improved Adversarial Transferability: A Theoretical Framework and Algorithmic Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation
0.912025
BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-Box Adversarial Attacks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.912025
BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-Box Adversarial Attacks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
black-box attack
0.912025
BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-Box Adversarial Attacks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.612022
Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
distribution matching
0.612022
Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
0.612022
Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
sample reweighting
0.612022
Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.212022
Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer-based attack · 1.7query-based attack · 1.7systematic survey · 1.0surrogate model ensemble · 1.0reverse adversarial perturbation · 1.0lifecycle taxonomy · 1.0flat minima optimization · 1.0optimal transport · 0.6bi-level optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Defenses in Adversarial Machine Learning: A Systematic Survey From the Lifecycle Perspective
abstract
Adversarial phenomena have been widely observed in machine learning (ML) systems, especially those using deep neural networks. These phenomena describe situations where ML systems may produce predictions that are inconsistent and incomprehensible to humans in certain specific cases. Such behavior poses a serious security threat to the practical application of ML systems. To exploit this vulnerability, several advanced attack paradigms have been developed, mainly including backdoor attacks, weight attacks, and adversarial examples. For each individual attack paradigm, various defense mechanisms have been proposed to enhance the robustness of models against the corresponding attacks. However, due to the independence and diversity of these defense paradigms, it is challenging to assess the overall robustness of an ML system against different attack paradigms. This survey aims to provide a systematic review of all existing defense paradigms from a unified lifecycle perspective. Specifically, we decompose a complete ML system into five stages: pre-training, training, post-training, deployment, and inference. We then present a clear taxonomy to categorize representative defense methods at each stage. The unified perspective and taxonomy not only help us analyze defense mechanisms but also enable us to understand the connections and differences among different defense paradigms. It inspires future research to develop more advanced and comprehensive defense strategies.
Baoyuan Wu, Mingli Zhu, Meixi Zheng, Zihao Zhu 0001, Shaokui Wei, Hongrui Chen, Danni Yuan, Li Liu 0036, Qingshan Liu 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2026 Seeking Flat Minima Over Diverse Surrogates for Improved Adversarial Transferability: A Theoretical Framework and Algorithmic Instantiation
abstract
The transfer-based black-box adversarial attack setting poses the challenge of crafting an adversarial example (AE) on known surrogate models that remains effective against unseen target models. Due to the practical importance of this task, numerous methods have been proposed to address this challenge. However, most previous methods are heuristically designed and intuitively justified, lacking a theoretical foundation. To bridge this gap, we derive a novel transferability bound that offers provable guarantees for adversarial transferability. Our theoretical analysis has the advantages of (i) deepening our understanding of previous methods by building a general attack framework and (ii) providing guidance for designing an effective attack algorithm. Our theoretical results demonstrate that optimizing AEs toward flat minima over the surrogate model set, while controlling the surrogate-target model shift measured by the adversarial model discrepancy, yields a comprehensive guarantee for AE transferability. The results further lead to a general transfer-based attack framework, within which we observe that previous methods consider only partial factors contributing to the transferability. Algorithmically, inspired by our theoretical results, we first elaborately construct the surrogate model set in which models exhibit diverse adversarial vulnerabilities with respect to AEs to narrow the instantiated adversarial model discrepancy. Then, a model-Diversity-compatible Reverse Adversarial Perturbation (DRAP) is generated to effectively promote the flatness of AEs over diverse surrogate models to improve transferability. Extensive experiments on NIPS2017 and CIFAR-10 datasets against various target models demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed attack.
Meixi Zheng, Kehan Wu, Yanbo Fan, Rui Huang 0001, Baoyuan Wu
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2025 BlackboxBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Black-Box Adversarial Attacks
abstract
Adversarial examples are well-known tools to evaluate the vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs). Although lots of adversarial attack algorithms have been developed, it's still challenging in the practical scenario that the model's parameters and architectures are inaccessible to the attacker/evaluator, i.e., black-box adversarial attacks. Due to the practical importance, there has been rapid progress from recent algorithms, reflected by the quick increase in attack success rate and quick decrease in query numbers to the target model. However, there lacks thorough evaluations and comparisons among these algorithms, causing difficulties in tracking the real progress, analyzing advantages and disadvantages of different technical routes, as well as designing future development roadmap of this field. Thus, we aim at building a comprehensive benchmark of black-box adversarial attacks, called BlackboxBench. It mainly provides: 1) a unified, extensible and modular-based codebase, implementing 29 query-based attack algorithms and 30 transfer-based attack algorithms; 2) comprehensive evaluations: we evaluate the implemented algorithms against several mainstreaming model architectures on 2 widely used datasets (CIFAR-10 and a subset of ImageNet), leading to 14,950 evaluations$^{1}$1 in total; 3) thorough analysis and new insights, as well analytical tools.
Meixi Zheng, Xuanchen Yan, Zihao Zhu 0001, Hongrui Chen, Baoyuan Wu
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2022 Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification
abstract
Imbalanced data pose challenges for deep learning based classification models. One of the most widely-used approaches for tackling imbalanced data is re-weighting, where training samples are associated with different weights in the loss function. Most of existing re-weighting approaches treat the example weights as the learnable parameter and optimize the weights on the meta set, entailing expensive bilevel optimization. In this paper, we propose a novel re-weighting method based on optimal transport (OT) from a distributional point of view. Specifically, we view the training set as an imbalanced distribution over its samples, which is transported by OT to a balanced distribution obtained from the meta set. The weights of the training samples are the probability mass of the imbalanced distribution andlearned by minimizing the OT distance between the two distributions. Compared with existing methods, our proposed one disengages the dependence of the weight learning on the concerned classifier at each iteration. Experiments on image, text and point cloud datasets demonstrate that our proposed re-weighting method has excellent performance, achieving state-of-the-art results in many cases andproviding a promising tool for addressing the imbalanced classification issue. The code has been made available athttps://github.com/DandanGuo1993/reweight-imbalance-classification-with-OT.
Dandan Guo, Meixi Zheng, He Zhao 0001, Mingyuan Zhou, Hongyuan Zha
NeurIPS3