Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Bråtelund

dblp:308/6463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
epipolar geometry estimation
0.712023
Compatibility of Fundamental Matrices for Complete Viewing Graphs · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.712023
Compatibility of Fundamental Matrices for Complete Viewing Graphs · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization
0.712023
Compatibility of Fundamental Matrices for Complete Viewing Graphs · ICCV 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank conditions · 0.7eigenvalue conditions · 0.7algebraic geometry · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Critical configurations for two projective views, a new approach
abstract
This article develops new techniques to classify critical configurations for 3D scene reconstruction from images taken by unknown cameras. Generally, all information can be uniquely recovered if enough images and image points are provided, but there are certain cases where unique recovery is impossible; these are called critical configurations. In this paper, we use an algebraic approach to study the critical configurations for two projective cameras. We show that all critical configurations lie on quadric surfaces, and classify exactly which quadrics constitute a critical configuration. The paper also describes the relation between the different reconstructions when unique reconstruction is impossible.
Martin Bråtelund
J. Symb. Comput.1
2023 Compatibility of Fundamental Matrices for Complete Viewing Graphs
abstract
This paper studies the problem of recovering cameras from a set of fundamental matrices. A set of fundamental matrices is said to be compatible if a set of cameras exists for which they are the fundamental matrices. We focus on the complete graph, where fundamental matrices for each pair of cameras are given. Previous work has established necessary and sufficient conditions for compatibility as rank and eigenvalue conditions on the n-view fundamental matrix obtained by concatenating the individual fundamental matrices. In this work, we show that the eigenvalue condition is redundant in the generic and collinear cases. We provide explicit homogeneous polynomials that describe necessary and sufficient conditions for compatibility in terms of the fundamental matrices and their epipoles. In this direction, we find that quadruple-wise compatibility is enough to ensure global compatibility for any number of cameras. We demonstrate that for four cameras, compatibility is generically described by triple-wise conditions and one additional equation involving all fundamental matrices.
Martin Bråtelund, Felix Rydell
ICCV1