Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel W. Linna Jr.

dblp:309/7474 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0053-5198ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Time series and sequential data · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Web and social media mining · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining
social media analysis
1.322026
SMART: A Social Movement Analysis & Reasoning Tool with Case Studies on #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter · WWW 2026
DEEP: A Discourse Evolution Engine for Predictions About Social Movements · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting
1.012026
DEEP: A Discourse Evolution Engine for Predictions About Social Movements · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
1.012026
DEEP: A Discourse Evolution Engine for Predictions About Social Movements · AAAI 2026
Computational social science and digital humanities
social movement analysis
1.012026
DEEP: A Discourse Evolution Engine for Predictions About Social Movements · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 3.0multivariate time series forecasting · 3.0social network analysis · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DEEP: A Discourse Evolution Engine for Predictions About Social Movements
abstract
Numerous social movements (SMs) around the world help support the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Understanding how key events shape SMs is key to the achievement of the SDGs. We have developed SMART (Social Media Analysis & Reasoning Tool) to track social movements related to the SDGs. SMART was designed by a multidisciplinary team of AI researchers, journalists, communications scholars and legal experts. This paper describes SMART's transformer-based multivariate time series Discourse Evolution Engine for Predictions about Social Movements (DEEP) to predict the volume of future articles/posts and the emotions expressed. DEEP outputs probabilistic forecasts with uncertainty estimates, providing critical support for editorial planning and strategic decision-making. We evaluate DEEP with a case study of the #MeToo movement by creating a novel longitudinal dataset (433K Reddit posts and 121K news articles) from September 2024 to June 2025, which is publicly available for research purposes.
Valerio La Gatta, Marco Postiglione, Jeremy Gilbert, Daniel W. Linna Jr., Morgan Manella Greenfield, Aaron D. Shaw, V. S. Subrahmanian
AAAI4
2026 SMART: A Social Movement Analysis & Reasoning Tool with Case Studies on #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter
Valerio La Gatta, Marco Postiglione, Jeremy Gilbert, Daniel W. Linna Jr., Morgan Manella Greenfield, Aaron D. Shaw, V. S. Subrahmanian
WWW4
2024 Structured Legal Argumentation with LLMs: A Study in Landlord-Tenant Law
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated capabilities across a wide range of tasks, including natural language understanding, language generation and generating basic reasoning. To improve the accuracy and reliability of these models, various prompting, augmentation, and fine-tuning strategies have been employed. In this paper, we use context augmentation and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) instructions to generate legal arguments for specific landlord-tenant problems using OpenAI’s GPT-4o. We test this approach using ten hypothetical landlord-tenant scenarios, five provided by a legal aid organization, four generated with Anthropic’s Claude, and one crafted by us. We evaluate each argument for accuracy, factuality, comprehensiveness, and relevance to the scenario. This method of generating legal reasoning with LLMs offers the advantage of being verifiable by legal professionals, while also providing valuable assistance to laypersons in drafting documents such as demand letters, which can help expand access to justice.
Gregoire Fournier, Daniel W. Linna Jr.
JURIX2