Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jorn R. de Haan

dblp:31/6368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.612022
PanTools v3: functional annotation, classification and phylogenomics · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics › pangenomics
pan-genome analysis
0.612022
PanTools v3: functional annotation, classification and phylogenomics · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
functional annotation
0.212022
PanTools v3: functional annotation, classification and phylogenomics · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenomics
0.212022
PanTools v3: functional annotation, classification and phylogenomics · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112007
Interpretation of ANOVA models for microarray data using PCA · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.012007
Interpretation of ANOVA models for microarray data using PCA · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph database · 0.6principal component analysis · 0.1biplot · 0.1ANOVA · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 PanTools v3: functional annotation, classification and phylogenomics
abstract
SUMMARY: The ever-increasing number of sequenced genomes necessitates the development of pangenomic approaches for comparative genomics. Introduced in 2016, PanTools is a platform that allows pangenome construction, homology grouping and pangenomic read mapping. The use of graph database technology makes PanTools versatile, applicable from small viral genomes like SARS-CoV-2 up to large plant or animal genomes like tomato or human. Here, we present our third major update to PanTools that enables the integration of functional annotations and provides both gene-level analyses and phylogenetics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PanTools is implemented in Java 8 and released under the GNU GPLv3 license. Software and documentation are available at https://git.wur.nl/bioinformatics/pantools. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Eef M. Jonkheer, Dirk-Jan M. van Workum, Siavash Sheikhizadeh Anari, Balázs Brankovics, Jorn R. de Haan, Lidija Berke, Theo A. J. van der Lee, Dick de Ridder, Sandra Smit
Bioinform.5
2017 PERGOLA: fast and deterministic linkage mapping of polyploids
abstract
BACKGROUND: A large share of agriculturally and horticulturally important plant species are polyploid. Linkage maps are used to locate associations between genes and traits by breeders and geneticists. Linkage map creation for polyploid species is not supported by standard tools. We want to overcome this limitation and validate our results with simulation studies. RESULTS: We developed PERGOLA, a deterministic and heuristic method that addresses this problem. We show that it creates correct linkage groups, marker orders and distances for simulated and real datasets. We compare it to existing tools and demonstrate that it overcomes limitations in ploidy and outperforms them in computational time and mapping accuracy. We represent linkage maps as dendrograms and show that this has advantages in the comparison of different maps. CONCLUSIONS: PERGOLA can be used successfully to calculate linkage maps for diploid and polyploid species and outperforms existing tools.
Fabian Grandke, Soumya Ranganathan, Nikkie van Bers, Jorn R. de Haan, Dirk Metzler
BMC Bioinform.4
2010 Integrating gene expression and GO classification for PCA by preclustering
abstract
BACKGROUND: Gene expression data can be analyzed by summarizing groups of individual gene expression profiles based on GO annotation information. The mean expression profile per group can then be used to identify interesting GO categories in relation to the experimental settings. However, the expression profiles present in GO classes are often heterogeneous, i.e., there are several different expression profiles within one class. As a result, important experimental findings can be obscured because the summarizing profile does not seem to be of interest. We propose to tackle this problem by finding homogeneous subclasses within GO categories: preclustering. RESULTS: Two microarray datasets are analyzed. First, a selection of genes from a well-known Saccharomyces cerevisiae dataset is used. The GO class "cell wall organization and biogenesis" is shown as a specific example. After preclustering, this term can be associated with different phases in the cell cycle, where it could not be associated with a specific phase previously. Second, a dataset of differentiation of human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) into osteoblasts is used. For this dataset results are shown in which the GO term "skeletal development" is a specific example of a heterogeneous GO class for which better associations can be made after preclustering. The Intra Cluster Correlation (ICC), a measure of cluster tightness, is applied to identify relevant clusters. CONCLUSIONS: We show that this method leads to an improved interpretability of results in Principal Component Analysis.
Jorn R. de Haan, Ester Piek, René C. van Schaik, Jacob de Vlieg, Susanne Bauerschmidt, Lutgarde M. C. Buydens, Ron Wehrens
BMC Bioinform.1
2007 Interpretation of ANOVA models for microarray data using PCA
abstract
MOTIVATION: ANOVA is a technique, which is frequently used in the analysis of microarray data, e.g. to assess the significance of treatment effects, and to select interesting genes based on P-values. However, it does not give information about what exactly is causing the effect. Our purpose is to improve the interpretation of the results from ANOVA on large microarray datasets, by applying PCA on the individual variance components. Interaction effects can be visualized by biplots, showing genes and variables in one plot, providing insight in the effect of e.g. treatment or time on gene expression. Because ANOVA has removed uninteresting sources of variance, the results are much more interpretable than without ANOVA. Moreover, the combination of ANOVA and PCA provides a simple way to select genes, based on the interactions of interest. RESULTS: It is shown that the components from an ANOVA model can be summarized and visualized with PCA, which improves the interpretability of the models. The method is applied to a real time-course gene expression dataset of mesenchymal stem cells. The dataset was designed to investigate the effect of different treatments on osteogenesis. The biplots generated with the algorithm give specific information about the effects of specific treatments on genes over time. These results are in agreement with the literature. The biological validation with GO annotation from the genes present in the selections shows that biologically relevant groups of genes are selected. AVAILABILITY: R code with the implementation of the method for this dataset is available from http://www.cac.science.ru.nl under the heading "Software".
Jorn R. de Haan, Ron Wehrens, Susanne Bauerschmidt, Ester Piek, René C. van Schaik, Lutgarde M. C. Buydens
Bioinform.1