Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vinit Ogale
dblp:31/6744
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 30% Embedded and real-time systems · 30% Distributed systems · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › concurrency control
deadlock detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Predictive runtime verification of multi-processor SoCs in SystemC · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Predictive runtime verification of multi-processor SoCs in SystemC · DAC 2008 |
Embedded and real-time systems › runtime monitoring
runtime verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Predictive runtime verification of multi-processor SoCs in SystemC · DAC 2008 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Predictive runtime verification of multi-processor SoCs in SystemC · DAC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
predictive runtime verification · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Predictive runtime verification of multi-processor SoCs in SystemCabstractConcurrent interaction of multi-processor systems result in errors which are difficult to find. Traditional simulation-based verification techniques remove the concurrency information by arbitrary schedulings. We present a novel simulation-based technique for SystemC that preserves and exploits concurrency information. Our approach is unique in that we can detect potential errors in an observed execution, even if the error does not actually occur in that execution. We identify synchronization constructs in SystemC and develop predictive techniques for temporal assertion verification and deadlock detection. Our automated potential deadlock detection algorithm works on SystemC programs with semaphores, locks, wait and notify synchronizations and has less overhead compared with assertion verification. We patched SystemC kernel to implement our solution and obtained favorable results on industrial designs. Alper Sen 0001, Vinit Ogale, Magdy S. Abadir |
DAC | 2 |