Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luca Scheuer

dblp:310/1873 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-1509-6072ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 53% Motion planning and robot control · 32% Robot navigation and mapping · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.612022
Post-Stall Navigation with Fixed-Wing UAVs using Onboard Vision · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.212022
Post-Stall Navigation with Fixed-Wing UAVs using Onboard Vision · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
nonlinear model predictive control
0.212022
Post-Stall Navigation with Fixed-Wing UAVs using Onboard Vision · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › 3d mapping
point cloud mapping
0.212022
Post-Stall Navigation with Fixed-Wing UAVs using Onboard Vision · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

onboard stereo vision · 0.6nanomap · 0.6direct nonlinear model predictive control · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Planning and Control for a Dynamic Morphing-Wing UAV Using a Vortex Particle Model
abstract
Achieving precise, highly-dynamic maneuvers with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is a major challenge due to the complexity of the associated aerodynamics. In particular, unsteady effectsas might be experienced in post-stall regimes or during sudden vehicle morphing-can have an adverse impact on the performance of modern flight control systems. In this paper, we present a vortex particle model and associated model-based controller capable of reasoning about the unsteady aerodynamics during aggressive maneuvers. We evaluate our approach in hardware on a morphing-wing UAV executing post-stall perching maneuvers. Our results show that the use of the unsteady aerodynamics model improves performance during both fixed-wing and dynamic-wing perching, while the use of wing-morphing planned with quasi-steady aerodynamics results in reduced performance. While the focus of this paper is a pre-computed control policy, we believe that, with sufficient computational resources, our approach could enable online planning in the future.
Gino Perrotta, Luca Scheuer, Yocheved Kopel, Max Basescu, Adam Polevoy, Kevin C. Wolfe, Joseph L. Moore
IROS2
2022 Post-Stall Navigation with Fixed-Wing UAVs using Onboard Vision
abstract
Recent research has enabled fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to maneuver in constrained spaces through the use of direct nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) [1]. However, this approach has been limited to a priori known maps and ground truth state measurements. In this paper, we present a direct NMPC approach that leverages NanoMap [2], a light-weight point cloud mapping framework, to generate collision-free trajectories using onboard stereo vision. We first explore our approach in simulation and demonstrate that our algorithm is sufficient to enable vision-based navigation in urban environments. We then demonstrate our approach in hardware using a 42-inch fixed-wing UAV and show that our motion planning algorithm is capable of navigating around a building using a minimalistic set of goal-points. We also show that point cloud history is important for navigating in these types of constrained environments.
Adam Polevoy, Max Basescu, Luca Scheuer, Joseph L. Moore
ICRA3